One Pinyin system, please
I’m a big fan of WikiLeaks, which recently leaked an English-language transcription of excerpts from a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) standing committee meeting, which apparently was not reported in the local media, including the Taipei Times. The transcription reads:
“You know the KMT is going to vote to allow ‘free,’ independent travelers to come to Taiwan. How can we leverage their arrival to help close the huge rich-poor divide?” one leader, code-named “English,” asked at the beginning of the session.
“I know!” shouted another DPP member, code-named “Loser,” according to the leak. “Visitors from China can only read simplified characters, and they all use Hanyu pinyin, so let’s change everything we can to Wade-Giles!”
“Brilliant,” said another man. “Let’s put one version of pinyin on our giveaway Taipei maps, another one on the internal bus display, and make sure they’re both different from the signs at the MRT stations, street signs and Google maps. We’ve already made achievements in this area!” he boasted. “If you’re trying to go to Gongguan MRT station, the sign on the bus says ‘Kungkuan.’ Hahaha!” He laughed out loud insanely. “That will really screw with all the foreigners!”
English spoke up. “But how will this help us narrow the rich-poor divide?”
“You’re an idiot,” said Loser, using the colloquial Taiwanese expression for when someone says something either totally stupid or too-intentionally cute. “Taxi drivers are some of the poorest people in Taiwan. After all, statistics show that 95 percent of their time and gas money is spent driving around, trolling for fares. The more foreigners that get lost, the more money the taxi drivers will make!”
“Right!” shouted the unidentified speaker. “At least half of Taiwanese taxi drivers can’t speak Chinese anyway, so their passengers will get hopelessly lost! Maybe confused tourists will get driven to ‘KeeLung!’” he added. “The more taxis foreigners have to take to get where they want to go, the more Taiwan’s rich-poor divide will shrink!”
English agreed: “Yes, the best way to ensure financial prosperity for Taiwan’s poor is to use as many different versions of pinyin as possible!”
I’m surprised that the Taipei Times hasn’t perused this WikiLeaks goldmine of inside information. Where’s Johnny when we need him?
Torch Pratt
Yonghe
Let Chinese see democracy
Your editorial on ARATS Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) (“Security overkill robs envoy, public,” Dec. 23, 2010, page 8) was quite a good read and made a very good point in its conclusion.
The final line suggested that if Taiwanese had the right or opportunity to grill President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in public, then why did the government and police not allow the same treatment to be doled out to the chairman?
A further point could have been made about how after allowing Chen to hear protests, Chinese officials would perhaps start to understand a little bit about what democracy means.
Moreover, using tactics to allow Chen to avoid seeing our national flag also reminds us of the weakness of “Mr Ma’s” government.
The government can only be strong with a strong democracy. Let the Chinese elite hear it and see if back door negotiations continue.
In a true democracy, people’s voices are heard. What a shame that Taiwan seems to be headed in the wrong direction.
Harry Adamopoulos
Taipei City
Sean Lien’s magic bullet
The magic bullet fired on the eve of the special municipality elections has tarnished the democracy of Taiwan. Polls indicate that over 70 percent do not believe this case to be as simple as it seems.
Indeed, there are many doubts and questions surrounding the incident.
After seeing a clip that showed how many “spectators” rushed onto the stage to help Sean Lien (連勝文), creating a human wall and a chaotic scene, it only reinforces the belief of many that this incident is a plot like in the movie The Sting.
It is incredible and surreal that so many “spectators” were so brave and eager to “protect” Lien that they forgot they faced a perpetrator holding a 9mm handgun and four bullets.
A normal reaction would have made the spectators duck and run for cover.
I hope the DPP will stick to its guns in pushing for the establishment of a truth finding committee to get to the bottom of the matter.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers