Perhaps it is because President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) team of officials tell too many lies that former Academia Historica president Lin Man-houng (林滿紅) felt it necessary to explain, during a question-and-answer session at the legislature, the difference between lies that are beautiful and ones that are not. She evidently thought this would help her keep her job. In the end, her own lies caught up with her when it was proven that she had signed an official document about an issue that she originally said she knew nothing about. Once she was found out, she had little choice but to step down.
Being able to tell “beautiful” lies and making oaths in a “high-class” manner are key to the Ma administration’s rule. Of course, the most skilled in the art of telling beautiful lies is none other than Ma himself.
Ma has told a heap of lies. I am sure everyone has heard the following ones:
‧ “I love Taiwan and would be Taiwanese even if I were burnt to ashes.”
This campaign statement moved Taiwan’s well-meaning electorate, who duly voted Ma into power. However, Ma has his own special understanding of what “loving Taiwan” means. He keeps on jumping into bed with China and God only knows how many secret talks are going on between his government and Beijing. Ma’s actions in this regard speak louder than his words.
‧ “There is only one China and that is the Republic of China.”
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) were chased out of China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and were forced into exile all around the world, with the vast majority of KMT members ending up in Taiwan and claiming that the KMT was the sole legitimate government of China. Former Chinese premier Zhou Enlai (周恩來), who made Lin’s poll of the top 100 most influential figures in the Republic of China’s (ROC) history, tore this lie apart years ago when he said that former KMT leader Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was hated by the people in China and that he had no right to talk about there being only one China because the legal status of the small island that he later took control of was never settled.
‧ “The Treaty of Taipei affirmed the transfer of Taiwan’s sovereignty from Japan to the ROC.”
Lin did well with these comments, landing her position as president of Academia Historica on the strength of them. However, this idea paints former foreign minister George Yeh (葉公超) and former ambassador to the US Wellington Koo (顧維鈞), who were responsible for negotiating the treaty, in a bad light, making them look like idiots. After all they did for the “ROC,” they are now being accused of being weak negotiators by disingenuous legislators.
‧ “Taiwan is where Ma grew up. Why would anybody betray the place where they grew up?”
If this were true, there would never have been any talk about people being traitors to the nation, traitors to the Han Chinese (漢奸) and traitors to Taiwan (台奸). Now the KMT would have its members running around China selling out Taiwan left, right and center, surrendering in the hope of appeasement.
According to the Treaty of San Francisco, the sovereignty of Taiwan does not belong to China and regardless of whether they were born in Taiwan, anyone who accepts the “one China” principle, which means that China has sovereignty over Taiwan, is guilty of selling Taiwan out.
A lie is a lie and lies are ugly and have nothing to do with beauty. Lies do not become the truth just because they are phrased beautifully.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
RSS