Like a series of time bombs set to go off in sequence, several cases of schoolyard bullying have been exposed, finally coming to the attention of the public and the educational authorities. But is schoolyard bullying really anything new? A study by the Ministry of Education shows that 2 percent of junior high school students have been bullied. Since there are 950,000 junior high school students in Taiwan, that means between 10,000 to 20,000 students have been victims of bullying.
The ministry is informed only of a few dozen cases every year. This implies that schoolyard bullying is handled with a head-in-the-sand attitude, either with the responsible party purposely covering up such incidents or ignoring them altogether. Such behavior runs counter to the fundamental purposes of education.
With the issue now in the spotlight, the ministry has said that it is to implement a program to prevent schoolyard bullying immediately. If school presidents do not handle such incidents, they will not be able to receive an A (甲) assessment, the highest grading, in their performance review, and subsidies will be deducted from the local government supervising their school. These measures may go some way toward preventing schools from covering up and not reporting bullying.
A careful look at how schools handle bullying shows that they are either explained away as isolated incidents or as boisterous games that have gone too far. Victims of bullying will only feel confident in turning to the school for help if the issue is seen to be receiving serious attention.
It is important to concede that schoolyard bullying shows schools are failing to foster diversity and mutual respect. I would like to suggest some ways in which schools should deal with the problem, in terms of creating the proper school environment and staff attitude. I hope these will go some way to building an amicable school system free of bullying.
In terms of the school environment, the most important thing is to reduce the number of blind spots on the school premises and to set up alarms throughout the schoolyard so that bullying can be revealed the moment an incident occurs. Furthermore, schools should use weekly assemblies and activities to show their determination to deal with bullying, to let the perpetrators know that such behavior is not tolerated, to let victims know that there will be no retaliation for those brave enough to speak up and to let the other students know that reporting bullying incidents is a display of civil courage.
This could serve to build a mini civil society and if each student and teacher could learn a feeling of empathy for others, they would be able to respect and protect other people. This would create an atmosphere conducive to a friendly schoolyard.
In terms of staff attitudes, the school president should make teachers aware of their duty to intervene in bullying. There are mainly two reasons teachers ignore bullying: They might not be up to handling the issue by themselves, in which case the school and maybe even the educational authorities should provide the necessary assistance. The other reason is that they themselves are the sources of bullying.
Most often, this takes the form of verbal bullying, in which the teacher uses language, such as ridicule, to increase divisions within the class, giving some students a reason for bullying another student by saying that “the teacher doesn’t like you anyway.”
When bullying originates with a teacher, he or she has “behaved inappropriately and therefore impaired the teacher’s morals and dignity” as the Teachers’ Act (教師法) puts it. When a teacher deliberately covers up and neglects to report a bullying incident, that teacher is “not fulfilling a teacher’s duties or being incompetent in teaching” according to the same act. In both instances, the teacher should be disciplined.
Since zero-tolerance for corporal punishment was established in the Educational Fundamental Act (教育基本法), corporal punishment has diminished, but bullying between students has increased and there have even been rumors that teachers use students to punish other students.
In general, efforts to improve a school’s environment and staff attitudes are the only ways to stop schoolyard bullying from occurring. Without such efforts, bullying will always be “an isolated incident” waiting to be dealt with and it will only become more and more common.
If we are unable to give students a peaceful and safe school environment, all talk about friendly schoolyards and a schoolyard in which human rights are respected will remain little but flowery phrases in educational policy statements, divorced from the reality of the situation.
Hsu Yue-dian is a professor of law at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers