Terry Gou (郭台銘), chairman of Hon Hai Group (鴻海集團), the owners of Chimei Innolux, launched a tirade against the government, accusing it of being unsupportive in the face of a huge fine levied by the European Commission against Chimei for alleged price-fixing. He claimed the government had been too slow in approving the relocation of flat panel production to China. The very next day, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said it would address the problem immediately. Was this a coincidence, or just another case of industry forcing the hand of government?
Whichever it is, it does make one think of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀), Both Hon Hai and TSMC are giants of the Taiwanese technology sector, although they have chosen different routes. TSMC has kept virtually all its major plants and technologies in Taiwan. It has not followed a policy of relocation to China or moving into the China market, but has succeeded in terms of technology and quality regardless.
It’s not that TSMC has never considered a move to China, but it was constrained by a “no haste, be patient” policy. It never claimed, however, that such a policy was stifling it. It toed the line and went about its business quietly, choosing not to rail against the government’s “N minus 1 principle” of keeping technology used by Taiwanese companies in China one step behind. They have succeeded regardless.
TSMC’s business revenue for this year is already up to US$13.2 billion. That puts them in fourth place among semiconductor manufacturers globally, and No. 1 in terms of producing wafers for other companies, leaving Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), which rushed over to China, far behind (SMIC’s revenue this year is only US$1.55 billion).
TSMC is also planning to plow US$10 billion into a large plant in either Tainan or Taichung. Last year it paid NT$9.5 billion (US$ 318 million) in taxes in Taiwan. It currently employs more than 30,000 people here, having taken on almost 9,000 staff this year by September.
It is no exaggeration to call it a major driver of economic recovery in this country, and it is certainly the bedrock of the supply chain in the Taiwanese high-tech industry. TSMC’s success is proof that a company can thrive without having to relocate to China.
Hon Hai has taken a different path. It focused on China, and once it had become established took advantage of the “active opening, effective management” policy. It could then keep prices low and increase production, enabling it to achieve astronomical growth rates and see its annual revenues increase tenfold within nine years.
Last year Foxconn (富士康), a company Hon Hai set up in China, was hit by a series of suicides by its workers in Guangdong and Shenzhen. Confounding predictions this would precipitate Hon Hai’s return to Taiwan, the company actually moved further inland, to Chengdu and Chongqing.
In fact, the plan is to move as much as 70 percent of the production volume to these inland factories within five years. Hon Hai, including Foxconn, currently employs 920,000 workers, and its exports in 2008 were worth about US$55.6 billion. The company is, then, one of the great driving forces within China’s high-tech industry.
Both TSMC and Hon Hai are corporate success stories. The former has kept its base in Taiwan, the latter has moved into China. The former is ahead in terms of technology, the latter is competitive with its low prices.
Hon Hai is successful, but its major contribution is to China. It has helped create jobs there, and has enabled China to transform itself into a major high-tech nation.
TSMC can also claim success, albeit of a different kind. It has made a considerable contribution to Taiwan in terms of salaries and tax revenue and, even more importantly, it has not sought to force the government’s hand for its own commercial interests. It has helped Taiwan consolidate its status as a major global player in the high-tech industry.
My question is, to whom do we owe the most gratitude?
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to former president Chen Shui-bian.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US