Terry Gou (郭台銘), chairman of Hon Hai Group (鴻海集團), the owners of Chimei Innolux, launched a tirade against the government, accusing it of being unsupportive in the face of a huge fine levied by the European Commission against Chimei for alleged price-fixing. He claimed the government had been too slow in approving the relocation of flat panel production to China. The very next day, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said it would address the problem immediately. Was this a coincidence, or just another case of industry forcing the hand of government?
Whichever it is, it does make one think of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) chairman Morris Chang (張忠謀), Both Hon Hai and TSMC are giants of the Taiwanese technology sector, although they have chosen different routes. TSMC has kept virtually all its major plants and technologies in Taiwan. It has not followed a policy of relocation to China or moving into the China market, but has succeeded in terms of technology and quality regardless.
It’s not that TSMC has never considered a move to China, but it was constrained by a “no haste, be patient” policy. It never claimed, however, that such a policy was stifling it. It toed the line and went about its business quietly, choosing not to rail against the government’s “N minus 1 principle” of keeping technology used by Taiwanese companies in China one step behind. They have succeeded regardless.
TSMC’s business revenue for this year is already up to US$13.2 billion. That puts them in fourth place among semiconductor manufacturers globally, and No. 1 in terms of producing wafers for other companies, leaving Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), which rushed over to China, far behind (SMIC’s revenue this year is only US$1.55 billion).
TSMC is also planning to plow US$10 billion into a large plant in either Tainan or Taichung. Last year it paid NT$9.5 billion (US$ 318 million) in taxes in Taiwan. It currently employs more than 30,000 people here, having taken on almost 9,000 staff this year by September.
It is no exaggeration to call it a major driver of economic recovery in this country, and it is certainly the bedrock of the supply chain in the Taiwanese high-tech industry. TSMC’s success is proof that a company can thrive without having to relocate to China.
Hon Hai has taken a different path. It focused on China, and once it had become established took advantage of the “active opening, effective management” policy. It could then keep prices low and increase production, enabling it to achieve astronomical growth rates and see its annual revenues increase tenfold within nine years.
Last year Foxconn (富士康), a company Hon Hai set up in China, was hit by a series of suicides by its workers in Guangdong and Shenzhen. Confounding predictions this would precipitate Hon Hai’s return to Taiwan, the company actually moved further inland, to Chengdu and Chongqing.
In fact, the plan is to move as much as 70 percent of the production volume to these inland factories within five years. Hon Hai, including Foxconn, currently employs 920,000 workers, and its exports in 2008 were worth about US$55.6 billion. The company is, then, one of the great driving forces within China’s high-tech industry.
Both TSMC and Hon Hai are corporate success stories. The former has kept its base in Taiwan, the latter has moved into China. The former is ahead in terms of technology, the latter is competitive with its low prices.
Hon Hai is successful, but its major contribution is to China. It has helped create jobs there, and has enabled China to transform itself into a major high-tech nation.
TSMC can also claim success, albeit of a different kind. It has made a considerable contribution to Taiwan in terms of salaries and tax revenue and, even more importantly, it has not sought to force the government’s hand for its own commercial interests. It has helped Taiwan consolidate its status as a major global player in the high-tech industry.
My question is, to whom do we owe the most gratitude?
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to former president Chen Shui-bian.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers