Character flaws
The Ministry of Education recently suggested that the name Taiwan should be written exclusively in traditional Chinese characters (臺灣) instead of the simplified form (台灣). This suggestion has been criticized as “too much leisure after a meal” to use a Taiwanese metaphor. It is as meaningless as suggesting that we write “the United States of America” instead of “the USA” or “the US.” The simplified form for Taiwan has been used for decades or even centuries — well before China adopted simplified Chinese characters, if that is what concerns the ministry.
It would be more meaningful if the ministry came out and suggested not writing or calling Taiwan “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwan, China.” In fact, Taiwan is not the Republic of China or the ROC, otherwise the term “the ROC on Taiwan” would be nonsensical. Taiwan has a much longer history than the ROC.
There are many other meaningful things on which the ministry could focus, such as educating students more about the true history and geography of Taiwan; treating Taiwanese graduate students as the equals of Chinese graduate students in granting scholarships; allowing college students the freedom of expression in their Internet communications; not changing transliterated signs from Tongyong pinyin, developed by the ministry itself, to Hanyu pinyin; and never adopting simplified Chinese characters.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Stretching a point too far
In an attempt to draw comparisons with the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), Huang Tien-lin (黃天麟) misrepresents the EU, perpetuating common misconceptions that exist more generally in Taiwan (“The EU is an example of effects of integration,” Dec. 12, page 8).
The EU may have been established in name in 1993 — but that rather ignores the previous 35 years of economic integration that did not fundamentally change the process of integration, but rather enhanced it.
Contrary to his claim, there were no “early harvest lists” as such — the terminology does not exist in an EU context and deliberately confuses the EU with the ECFA between China and Taiwan to make a simplistic political point.
Germany did not become “a hub” because of the market economy post-1993, as implied. It was a major European economy in the 19th and early 20th centuries, and became so again in the immediate postwar period — ironically, largely through economic planning and not through free market economics. Moreover, an understanding of European economics would perhaps reveal more than one “hub” existing across several countries.
The most famous one that’s been suggested — the “Blue Banana” — extended from northern Italy through parts of France and Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and southern and central UK. In this respect, economic integration arguably allows for the further development of such cross-border hubs.
The EU has not “recently admitted” to the existence of “two-track” development in the eurozone. It was evident as far back as the early 1970s when the European Economic and Monetary Union was first discussed. There were at the time, and would continue to be, regional differences. Indeed, special funds were established to try and mitigate these affects, funds that it could be argued Greece and Ireland in particular became too reliant on in the 1990s.
In addition, it was clear as long as 10 years ago that (for example) Ireland’s economy was experiencing an unsustainable boom — and that Germany’s economy was sluggish. Huang is, moreover, misinformed if he believes EU member states are of a similar size (they are most certainly not) and that the territorial size of a nation-state alone has some sort of bearing on its economy, as he appears to imply.
I could go on, but most comparisons between the EU and the ECFA are seriously flawed simply because in theory and in practice EU member states respect each others sovereignty as independent nation-states — they have no constitutional claims on each other and do not threaten each other with military action.
However, there is one lesson from the EU that is relevant to the ECFA. Economic integration leads to political integration. Indeed, political integration is the whole point of the EU and it has been since the 1950s. Economic integration was never intended purely for economic benefit alone, but for the political integration that it was hoped would follow.
Interestingly, Beijing is very open in viewing the ECFA as a first step in a similar process of economic integration leading inexorably to political integration between Taiwan and China.
PAUL DEACON
Kaohsiung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95