According to recent overseas news reports, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has declared himself intent on continuing the process of de-Stalinization. He has said on several occasions that although Josef Stalin made contributions, the crimes he committed against his own people should not be forgiven. Medvedev’s opinion is clearly at variance with that of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who served 17 years in the KGB. Russian society’s divided historical memories of the former Soviet ruler can seem rather familiar to us in Taiwan.
Stalin’s Great Purge, which claimed several million victims, is regarded by historians as one of history’s darkest periods. Nevertheless, in many people’s minds Stalin was a national hero who defended the Soviet Union against invasion by Nazi Germany and who governed the country in a very effective way. This year, as Russia solemnly celebrates the 65th anniversary of victory in World War II, the question of Stalin’s contributions and failings has once again become a focus of discussion.
The Moscow city government reportedly planned to include Stalin’s name and photographs in exhibitions and street decorations connected with the anniversary. The Russian Communist Party and other left-wing groups warmly welcomed this idea, encouraging people to think of Stalin as a founding father, thinker and patriot.
Human rights groups, on the other hand, strongly opposed the idea, saying that displaying posters that included Stalin’s portrait would be disrespectful to the victims of his despotic regime. The organizers responded that their intention was not to make propaganda on Stalin’s behalf, but simply to display historical photographs. They said that the international community recognized the Soviet people as the victors, while Stalin was the nation’s leader at the time. They pointed out that some of the photos were of Stalin meeting with then US president Franklin Roosevelt and then British prime minister Winston Churchill at the Tehran and Yalta conferences, and that surely Stalin could not be deleted from such pictures.
The question of how to evaluate Stalin has long been a thorny issue in Russia. In a television poll conducted this year to choose historical heroes, Stalin got the third highest number of votes, and history books that seek to rationalize his oppression continue to be published.
Last year Medvedev warned the public not to exaggerate Stalin’s achievements. He urged people to always remember the millions of Soviet people who suffered and died under Stalin’s rule, and criticized efforts to absolve the despotic regime of its responsibility.
As Medvedev put it, “Even now we can hear voices saying that those numerous deaths were justified by some supreme goals of the state. I am convinced that no development of a country, no success or ambitions can be achieved through human grief and losses.”
Medvedev also expressed -concern that as many as 90 percent of young people could not name one famous people who suffered or died as a result of political repression.
Further steps planned by Medvedev may include fully declassifying the regime’s archives, increasing the compensation paid to victims, tracking down victim’s burial sites, building more museums and memorials, and possibly even enacting laws forbidding the whitewashing of dictators.
Taiwan, too, was subject to authoritarian rule during the Martial Law Era. Compared to Russia, Taiwan has done better in terms of declassifying documents and compensating victims, but when it comes to divided historical memories about Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the situation in Taiwan is strangely similar to that in Russia.
We in Taiwan are justifiably proud of our democratic achievements, but regrettably the governments of both the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have displayed a reluctance to dispel antagonism between their supporters and made little effort to heal the wounds of the past.
On the one hand, the former DPP government was accused of clumsiness in its efforts at “de-Chiangization.” On the other, after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) led the KMT back to power, his government lost no time in putting back plaques and signs bearing the words “Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall,” which the DPP administration had for a while replaced with -“Democracy -Memorial Hall.” It has also continued to use state resources to commemorate the former authoritarian leaders.
Recently a dispute erupted over ownership of the diaries of the two Chiangs. Surprisingly, Commonwealth Publishing Co, which enjoys a good reputation, plans to publish the diaries of the elder Chiang under the title The Diaries of the Honorable Chiang (蔣公日記), choosing a feudal honorific, rather than The Diaries of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石日記), using his name in a neutral fashion, which is what Academia Sinica calls the diaries.
In addition, a descendant of the Chiangs has designed a range of memorabilia related to the two former dictators that includes pendants in the form of silver and gold-colored bullets. The idea behind this “creative” design may have something to do with the fact that much of Chiang Kai-shek’s life was devoted to military affairs, but for family members of people executed during the White Terror Era it is likely to have an altogether different meaning. Such an insensitive decision could easily reopen old wounds, but so far we have seen no public discussion of this matter, much less criticism.
In theory, Taiwan has traveled a lot further down the road of democratization than Russia, but when we compare the way the two societies have gone about handling the remnants of authoritarian rule, there is much less difference than one might imagine.
Yeh Hung-ling is executive secretary of the Taiwan Association for Truth and Reconciliation.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US