I read that British Prime Minister David Cameron is asking the UK’s Office of National Statistics to draft new measures of “general wellbeing,” and publish such figures regularly — most likely on a quarterly basis — in order to gauge the British people’s psychological well-being and their quality of life as a reference for government policy. If everything goes well, a questionnaire will be designed and launched next spring. At the same time, French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced last year that the government was to take the public’s happiness as an indicator of economic progress. Canada is also looking into the feasibility of a similar system.
Surveys on general wellbeing or happiness have long been valued in advanced Western countries. The US World Value Survey has investigated people’s subjective sense of wellbeing in various countries for quite a long time. More recently, both the British New Economics Foundation and Friends of the Earth have released the Happy Planet Index, focused mainly on environmental protection.
In Taiwan, the Cabinet’s Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics originally added a survey on the wellbeing of the Taiwanese to its annual social development trends report between 1998 and 2007. Unfortunately, subsequent surveys proved rather inconclusive, and this poll has been shelved.
After Taiwan’s second transfer of power in mid-2008, a more complete survey appeared as the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum (TCF), a new non-governmental organization (NGO), published an initial “happiness index,” followed by a second in the middle of last year. Surprisingly, the survey results showed that the public’s happiness was increasing in spite of the global financial crisis.
Seemingly, then, the relationship between economic prosperity and our sense of happiness differs somewhat from what we would intuitively assume. This is certainly worth looking into more deeply, and we could benefit from long-term surveys for different areas, cities, counties and aspects of life, all of which could inform policymaking. For example, former British prime minister Tony Blair took such survey results as a reference for his labor employment policy, showing that they can make a significant contribution.
Unfortunately, the plug was pulled on research into the Taiwanese index, a victim of the economic downturn. The TCF did not publish survey results this year.
A government should not allow such important surveys to be discontinued, or let private NGOs struggle to produce them with absolutely no support.
Many factors contribute to the public’s sense of happiness: Family relationships; marriage; the state of the economy; social interaction; income distribution; living standards; quality of education and transportation; democratic participation; government corruption — or lack thereof; cross-strait relations; and the perceived effectiveness of government policies.
These factors, linked as they are to people’s perception of their own happiness and wellbeing, can affect election results. We cannot expect economic performance alone to account for the results of the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Even if surveys, based exclusively on economic indicators existed, they would be unlikely to tell us much about the reasons for electoral results.
A smart government would exploit the advantage of being in power to commission regular opinion polls, which could inform policy and help secure votes. Assuming that the surveys are objective, academics could also use them for their research, which in turn would serve as valuable reference points in improving the quality of life in communities throughout the country.
These surveys should be done not only on a national, but also a local, level, either quarterly or every six months, to get a more local picture of the situation.
Are people unhappy because roads are uneven? Is it because public services are inadequate, and that people are given the runaround getting the most basic things done? Is it because streetlights are often broken, or traffic lights always on the blink? Is it because our streets are dangerous and people are afraid to leave their homes? Or is it because people illegally block parking spots to stop others from using that space?
Since these surveys would be funded with taxpayers’ money their results should be made public. The government should also accept responsibility for continuing these surveys, so they can drive improvements on both the national and local level.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) is very fond of talking about the “grassroots economy.” It is a natural extension for government policy to be based on an understanding of what the people actually want.
Tu Jenn-hwa is convener of the Taiwan Competitiveness Forum.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND DREW CAMERON
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past