Preserving remote places
Chan Shun-kuei (詹順貴) recently discussed the merits of upgrading the Suhua Highway (“Placing facts back in Suhua debate,” Nov. 19, page 8). One consideration I would like to add is whether easy access to every place is really a desirable goal. Disregarding the obvious costs to taxpayer and environment for the moment, building a faster and safer road at first always sounds like a good idea. However, the difficulty of reaching a remote place may enhance the charm of the travel experience.
To use an extreme example: I think most people would agree that being put on top of Mount Everest by a helicopter, although quicker and safer, would not really match the experience of climbing up its flanks for days, risking life and limb. We should value the fact that some places on earth remain remote, and that the effort of getting there is part of the quality of the travel experience.
I have heard it said there is no place in Taiwan that is so beautiful that a little bit of concrete would not increase its beauty. We should perhaps pause for a moment and consider whether the old Suhua Highway, because of the way it is built and the scenery it offers, is not worth preserving, and that the money would be better spent on enforcing traffic regulations and safe driving. From Chan Shun-kuei’s article, it is apparent that the old Suhua Highway is not really inherently dangerous, but that it is reckless driving that endangers people. Several thousand people die on Taiwan’s roads each year, making it a leading cause of death.
I always wonder what kind of money would be thrown at a terrorist group that would annually kill several thousand people, but when it comes to protecting us against the terrorists of the street, the government of Taiwan appears to be especially complacent. Numerous recent letters in the Taipei Times have pointed out that, for a country that has so much going for it, the appalling driving habits and the almost nonexistent enforcement of traffic rules are a real blight on this country.
I would strongly recommend that, in order to protect some of the remaining beautiful, natural and quiet places of Taiwan, the government of Taiwan should spend its money on making its existing streets safer instead of relentlessly building more and more roads into even the remotest corners of the country, or upgrading its existing ones. Thus, the present Suhua Highway would not just become a safer road to travel on, but also a relaxing travel experience through one of the more remote and scenic areas of Taiwan. The charm is in getting there — slowly and safely.
BRUNO WALTHER
Taipei
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS