Preserving remote places
Chan Shun-kuei (詹順貴) recently discussed the merits of upgrading the Suhua Highway (“Placing facts back in Suhua debate,” Nov. 19, page 8). One consideration I would like to add is whether easy access to every place is really a desirable goal. Disregarding the obvious costs to taxpayer and environment for the moment, building a faster and safer road at first always sounds like a good idea. However, the difficulty of reaching a remote place may enhance the charm of the travel experience.
To use an extreme example: I think most people would agree that being put on top of Mount Everest by a helicopter, although quicker and safer, would not really match the experience of climbing up its flanks for days, risking life and limb. We should value the fact that some places on earth remain remote, and that the effort of getting there is part of the quality of the travel experience.
I have heard it said there is no place in Taiwan that is so beautiful that a little bit of concrete would not increase its beauty. We should perhaps pause for a moment and consider whether the old Suhua Highway, because of the way it is built and the scenery it offers, is not worth preserving, and that the money would be better spent on enforcing traffic regulations and safe driving. From Chan Shun-kuei’s article, it is apparent that the old Suhua Highway is not really inherently dangerous, but that it is reckless driving that endangers people. Several thousand people die on Taiwan’s roads each year, making it a leading cause of death.
I always wonder what kind of money would be thrown at a terrorist group that would annually kill several thousand people, but when it comes to protecting us against the terrorists of the street, the government of Taiwan appears to be especially complacent. Numerous recent letters in the Taipei Times have pointed out that, for a country that has so much going for it, the appalling driving habits and the almost nonexistent enforcement of traffic rules are a real blight on this country.
I would strongly recommend that, in order to protect some of the remaining beautiful, natural and quiet places of Taiwan, the government of Taiwan should spend its money on making its existing streets safer instead of relentlessly building more and more roads into even the remotest corners of the country, or upgrading its existing ones. Thus, the present Suhua Highway would not just become a safer road to travel on, but also a relaxing travel experience through one of the more remote and scenic areas of Taiwan. The charm is in getting there — slowly and safely.
BRUNO WALTHER
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS