Formosan black bear travails
Recently, a Sky1 English TV series featured coverage of the Great Wall of China as one of the Seven Wonders of the World. At one site near the Great Wall, the program presented a bear enclosure that featured a number of Asian black bears — close cousins of the Formosan black bear in blood and appearance.
Not normally a fan of any kind of zoo or enclosure for wild animals, the sight of these bears in a barren pit begging for food from tourists both upset me and immediately raised in my mind a comparison with the treatment of pandas at Taipei Zoo.
The pandas at Taipei Zoo have an indoor and outdoor enclosure, lots of bamboo and a stylized design that supposedly makes them “feel at home.” Nothing like that exists for the cousins of the Formosan black bears. They get a sand pit with some climbing equipment and food thrown at them by tourists. The difference in treatment is like that of the Hilton and the average squat.
This differential treatment of the bears can also serve as a clear political analogy. Taiwanese are the black bears, locked in a barren enclosure they can’t get out of (the Republic of China [ROC] constitutional polity), being thrown scraps by tourists (purchasing visits by Chinese delegations), while the pandas — Chinese officials such as Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) — are given five-star VIP treatment (hiding, confiscating and destroying ROC flags to avoid hurting the Chinese people’s feelings).
The arrival of the pandas was supposed to signify warming relations between Taiwan and China, but the truth of Beijing’s real attitude to Taipei is seen in its treatment of the close cousins of our protected indigenous species — for Chinese officials, Taiwanese should be constrained and appeased and have no real long-term concessions offered to them.
If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wants to posit former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) acquittal from a set of bribery charges as a reason for Taiwanese not to vote for the Democratic Progressive Party, then surely the treatment of the endangered cousins of the Formosa black bears by Chinese while at the same time President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration bends over backwards to please China should be a good reason for voters to not believe anything the government says about Taiwan-China (read KMT-Chinese Communist Party or Chinese Taipei-People’s Republic of China) relations and to vote for a genuinely pro-Taiwan party instead.
Finally, isn’t it high time we ditched Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) as the “Father of the Nation” and instead called for the Formosan black bear (and the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin while we’re at it) to become the national symbols of the independent Taiwanese nation? Perhaps then, this myopic and ultra-Chinese nationalist KMT government will finally understand that Taiwanese do not want to be re-Sinicized into some imagined, imported and imposed “Greater China.”
BEN GOREN
Taichung
A reform to Ma’s liking
There has been talk recently of “judicial reform.” If this comes to pass, I have a suggestion: Perhaps the Presidential Office should inform the courts beforehand of its preferred outcome in high-profile trials and judges could simply state in the published decision whether it was “respected” by the national leadership, or if it rather buttressed the need for further judicial reform. This would save journalists and readers alike a lot of time.
PETER DEARMAN
Sindian
Belief protects A-bian
Dear President A-bian,
May peace be with you!
It was a pleasure to have seen and talked to you this morning.
Lately, I have had an urge to share with you some words. I believe the Lord wants to communicate to you through me with these words. God wants you to be blind.
“God will lead the blind through a way they do not know. God will guide them on paths they have not known.”
I hope these words will become the source for your consolation, strength and hope.
I was deeply sorry and sad to hear about your final verdict. However, I thought afterward: “God’s ways are higher than our ways and God’s thoughts are higher than our thoughts.”
Through this, I have been comforted. Although we don’t know what the final outcome will be, I beg you to “Trust in the almighty God and believe in Him with all your heart and all your might.”
Our Lord is always right. Although you can’t see it, the Holy Spirit does exist like the air we breathe; the air will make us alive if we breathe. By the same token, the Holy Spirit will lead us in every situation if we just allow it to enter our hearts. This is faith, not religion.
Lastly, please remain calm and use your heart to read God’s words — Isaiah 42 and 43, as I have, and let God speak to you directly.
May God be with you and your family!
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS