Formosan black bear travails
Recently, a Sky1 English TV series featured coverage of the Great Wall of China as one of the Seven Wonders of the World. At one site near the Great Wall, the program presented a bear enclosure that featured a number of Asian black bears — close cousins of the Formosan black bear in blood and appearance.
Not normally a fan of any kind of zoo or enclosure for wild animals, the sight of these bears in a barren pit begging for food from tourists both upset me and immediately raised in my mind a comparison with the treatment of pandas at Taipei Zoo.
The pandas at Taipei Zoo have an indoor and outdoor enclosure, lots of bamboo and a stylized design that supposedly makes them “feel at home.” Nothing like that exists for the cousins of the Formosan black bears. They get a sand pit with some climbing equipment and food thrown at them by tourists. The difference in treatment is like that of the Hilton and the average squat.
This differential treatment of the bears can also serve as a clear political analogy. Taiwanese are the black bears, locked in a barren enclosure they can’t get out of (the Republic of China [ROC] constitutional polity), being thrown scraps by tourists (purchasing visits by Chinese delegations), while the pandas — Chinese officials such as Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) — are given five-star VIP treatment (hiding, confiscating and destroying ROC flags to avoid hurting the Chinese people’s feelings).
The arrival of the pandas was supposed to signify warming relations between Taiwan and China, but the truth of Beijing’s real attitude to Taipei is seen in its treatment of the close cousins of our protected indigenous species — for Chinese officials, Taiwanese should be constrained and appeased and have no real long-term concessions offered to them.
If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wants to posit former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) acquittal from a set of bribery charges as a reason for Taiwanese not to vote for the Democratic Progressive Party, then surely the treatment of the endangered cousins of the Formosa black bears by Chinese while at the same time President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration bends over backwards to please China should be a good reason for voters to not believe anything the government says about Taiwan-China (read KMT-Chinese Communist Party or Chinese Taipei-People’s Republic of China) relations and to vote for a genuinely pro-Taiwan party instead.
Finally, isn’t it high time we ditched Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) as the “Father of the Nation” and instead called for the Formosan black bear (and the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin while we’re at it) to become the national symbols of the independent Taiwanese nation? Perhaps then, this myopic and ultra-Chinese nationalist KMT government will finally understand that Taiwanese do not want to be re-Sinicized into some imagined, imported and imposed “Greater China.”
A reform to Ma’s liking
There has been talk recently of “judicial reform.” If this comes to pass, I have a suggestion: Perhaps the Presidential Office should inform the courts beforehand of its preferred outcome in high-profile trials and judges could simply state in the published decision whether it was “respected” by the national leadership, or if it rather buttressed the need for further judicial reform. This would save journalists and readers alike a lot of time.
Belief protects A-bian
Dear President A-bian,
May peace be with you!
It was a pleasure to have seen and talked to you this morning.
Lately, I have had an urge to share with you some words. I believe the Lord wants to communicate to you through me with these words. God wants you to be blind.
“God will lead the blind through a way they do not know. God will guide them on paths they have not known.”
I hope these words will become the source for your consolation, strength and hope.
I was deeply sorry and sad to hear about your final verdict. However, I thought afterward: “God’s ways are higher than our ways and God’s thoughts are higher than our thoughts.”
Through this, I have been comforted. Although we don’t know what the final outcome will be, I beg you to “Trust in the almighty God and believe in Him with all your heart and all your might.”
Our Lord is always right. Although you can’t see it, the Holy Spirit does exist like the air we breathe; the air will make us alive if we breathe. By the same token, the Holy Spirit will lead us in every situation if we just allow it to enter our hearts. This is faith, not religion.
Lastly, please remain calm and use your heart to read God’s words — Isaiah 42 and 43, as I have, and let God speak to you directly.
May God be with you and your family!
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new