During former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe’s recent visit, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) began by addressing Abe by the wrong title and then attempted to obstruct his meeting with Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文).
Having worked in confidential government posts related to diplomacy and protocol, I feel compelled to express my feelings about these breaches of diplomatic protocol by Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government.
The DPP said that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs refused to arrange for Abe to meet with Tsai and when Abe attended a dinner at the DPP’s invitation, the ministry did not provide a car to take him there or a staff to accompany him. The former Japanese prime minister had to go to the dinner in a taxi.
According to my own experience, whenever the foreign ministry invites a guest, it provides a car and one or more staff members to accompany the guest and take notes. This was always the case whether the guest was a politician or an academic. To put it plainly, the person sent by the ministry to accompany a visitor acted as the visitor’s Taiwanese nanny. This person was charged with accompanying the guest on all of his or her engagements, keeping a record of what the guest said and did.
The former DPP government attached great importance to Taiwan’s relationships with the US and Japan. Only two other former Japanese prime ministers have visited Taiwan in the past 10 years — Yoshiro Mori, who came here in 2002 and 2006, and Taro Aso, who visited secretly in April this year. Given the difficult situation in which Taiwan finds itself diplomatically, Abe’s visit was a rare opportunity, so the government should have accorded the former prime minister its highest diplomatic courtesy.
The foreign ministry’s failure to cooperate when this important guest visited opposition lawmakers, forcing Abe to call a taxi to visit the lawmakers and others, was a serious breach of diplomatic protocol. The ministry has been trying hard to make excuses for this oversight. However, diplomatic work includes ensuring that diplomatic protocol is followed on every occasion. So it leads one to the conclusion that diplomats would not have allowed such a serious breach of protocol unless someone in high authority had instructed them to do so.
To make matters worse, when Ma met Abe, he twice addressed his visitor as, “Your Excellency, the deputy prime minister.” Could Ma, who prides himself on his global outlook and fluent English, really be unaware that Abe was Japan’s youngest post-World War II prime minister? It’s not really credible that he doesn’t know such elementary facts of international affairs as the names of former and serving Japanese prime ministers. The real reason for Ma’s slip-up is because he is cozying up to China, while distancing himself from the US and Japan.
I couldn’t help being reminded of Ma’s visit to Japan as KMT chairman in 2006 and his verbal and practical diplomatic faux pas on that occasion. At the time, Ma let it be known that he had met Abe, who was then-chief Cabinet secretary, but afterward the Chinese-language daily Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) exposed this claim as untrue. In fact, Ma didn’t meet Abe at all.
Now, four years later, we have further confirmation that the earlier meeting never took place, otherwise how could Ma have failed to recognize the man who later served as Japanese prime minister?
Daniel Shen is a former senior staff member to the deputy secretary-general of the Office of the President.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS