At the opening ceremony of the Tokyo International Film Festival on Oct. 23, the head of the Chinese delegation, Jiang Ping (江平), adopted the swagger of a “communist bandit,” demanding that the Taiwanese delegation should have its title changed to “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwan, China” and be merged with the Chinese delegation.
This was certainly not, as members of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have claimed, an isolated incident. Rather, it is the grave consequence of accepting the so-called “one China” principle. All China is doing is cashing the check that Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wrote.
Of course, Taiwanese condemn Jiang’s rudeness and China’s arrogance. All the more worthy of condemnation, though, is the Ma administration for its bungling incompetence in failing to insist that Taiwan’s sovereignty belongs to its people and instead accepting the “one China” principle that means Taiwan is a part of China. If this principle is accepted, it leaves no leeway for saying that the Republic of China (ROC) is a sovereign state, or that Taiwan is a sovereign state, or that the nation’s sovereignty lies with its people.
Nonetheless, even before the Tokyo film festival spat was over, bureaucrats from the Ma administration chimed in with an old lie that has become a joke after being repeated so many times in the past 60 years. As a Government Information Office (GIO) press release about the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) dispute put it: “The mainland remains within the constitutionally defined territory of the Republic of China. So, of course, we cannot voice any disagreement with the mainland authorities’ claim that the Diaoyutai Islands are China’s national territory.”
Put simply, this means that “one China” means the ROC. It really takes a convoluted mind and a great deal of nerve to say such things and keep a straight face. If it were true that the ROC was the one, genuine China and that its territory extends to all of China, then the government headed by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in Beijing would be a bogus one, or at best a local government. In that case, Frank Chen (陳志寬), director of the GIO’s Department of Motion Pictures, who headed the Taiwanese delegation to the Tokyo film festival, could have told Jiang Ping to change his delegation’s title to “Chinese mainland” and enter the ceremony directly behind the ROC delegation.
If the ROC is the real China, then when Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) came to Taiwan he should have been arrested as a “communist bandit” and locked up in Tucheng (土城) together with independence advocate, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). So why, in contrast, did we see Ma ordering ROC flags to be hidden away during Chen Yunlin’s visit and not complaining when the Chinese envoy addressed him as plain “you” instead of calling him President Ma?
Nowhere else in the world does anyone accept silly notions like “China is part of the ROC,” “China is part of Taiwan” or “the People’s Republic of China is part of the ROC.” As far as Taiwanese are concerned, the most important thing is to insist that Taiwan is not part of China.
No one understands the KMT’s lies better than the KMT itself. On Nov. 23, 1949, former Shanghai mayor Wu Kuo-chen (吳國楨), who had fled to Taiwan, confided to then-US consul-general in Taipei John MacDonald that Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) had written off China after Guangzhou fell to the communists and that Chiang’s most recent visit to Chongqing had been to preside over the China’s “burial service.”
That “burial service” took place six decades ago. Does Ma really think anyone still believes the old lies?
James Wang is a media commentator in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did