At the opening ceremony of the Tokyo International Film Festival on Oct. 23, the head of the Chinese delegation, Jiang Ping (江平), adopted the swagger of a “communist bandit,” demanding that the Taiwanese delegation should have its title changed to “Chinese Taipei” or “Taiwan, China” and be merged with the Chinese delegation.
This was certainly not, as members of the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) have claimed, an isolated incident. Rather, it is the grave consequence of accepting the so-called “one China” principle. All China is doing is cashing the check that Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wrote.
Of course, Taiwanese condemn Jiang’s rudeness and China’s arrogance. All the more worthy of condemnation, though, is the Ma administration for its bungling incompetence in failing to insist that Taiwan’s sovereignty belongs to its people and instead accepting the “one China” principle that means Taiwan is a part of China. If this principle is accepted, it leaves no leeway for saying that the Republic of China (ROC) is a sovereign state, or that Taiwan is a sovereign state, or that the nation’s sovereignty lies with its people.
Nonetheless, even before the Tokyo film festival spat was over, bureaucrats from the Ma administration chimed in with an old lie that has become a joke after being repeated so many times in the past 60 years. As a Government Information Office (GIO) press release about the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) dispute put it: “The mainland remains within the constitutionally defined territory of the Republic of China. So, of course, we cannot voice any disagreement with the mainland authorities’ claim that the Diaoyutai Islands are China’s national territory.”
Put simply, this means that “one China” means the ROC. It really takes a convoluted mind and a great deal of nerve to say such things and keep a straight face. If it were true that the ROC was the one, genuine China and that its territory extends to all of China, then the government headed by Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) in Beijing would be a bogus one, or at best a local government. In that case, Frank Chen (陳志寬), director of the GIO’s Department of Motion Pictures, who headed the Taiwanese delegation to the Tokyo film festival, could have told Jiang Ping to change his delegation’s title to “Chinese mainland” and enter the ceremony directly behind the ROC delegation.
If the ROC is the real China, then when Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) came to Taiwan he should have been arrested as a “communist bandit” and locked up in Tucheng (土城) together with independence advocate, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). So why, in contrast, did we see Ma ordering ROC flags to be hidden away during Chen Yunlin’s visit and not complaining when the Chinese envoy addressed him as plain “you” instead of calling him President Ma?
Nowhere else in the world does anyone accept silly notions like “China is part of the ROC,” “China is part of Taiwan” or “the People’s Republic of China is part of the ROC.” As far as Taiwanese are concerned, the most important thing is to insist that Taiwan is not part of China.
No one understands the KMT’s lies better than the KMT itself. On Nov. 23, 1949, former Shanghai mayor Wu Kuo-chen (吳國楨), who had fled to Taiwan, confided to then-US consul-general in Taipei John MacDonald that Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) had written off China after Guangzhou fell to the communists and that Chiang’s most recent visit to Chongqing had been to preside over the China’s “burial service.”
That “burial service” took place six decades ago. Does Ma really think anyone still believes the old lies?
James Wang is a media commentator in Taipei.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS