Revoke Ma’s law degree
Harvard University needs to think about revoking President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) law degree. The man knows there is no basis in international law for his repeated assertion that the Cairo Declaration and subsequent instruments somehow transferred sovereignty of Taiwan to the Republic of China (ROC) (“Ma sees lessons from victory in war of resistance,” Oct. 26, page 1).
In fact, the record is 100 percent clear. Japan was relieved of sovereignty over Taiwan on April 28, 1952, the day that the Allied peace treaty with Japan, the San Francisco Peace Treaty, came into force. Taiwan then entered a state of suspended sovereignty and remains so to this day. The allies did indeed acquiesce in the ROC’s “exercise of authority” over Taiwan from 1945 to 1952, as Ma notes, but at no point during that period was sovereignty transferred away from Japan.
Ma invokes a single statement by former US president Harry Truman in early 1950 to vindicate the ROC’s claim to Taiwan, but he ignores dozens of equally authoritative statements by allied leaders and governments, including other statements by Truman, that directly contradict the ROC line.
The allied position on Taiwan was summarized for the British parliament, in 1955, by then-British Foreign Office junior minister R. H. Turton as: “Formosa[’s] sovereignty was Japanese until 1952. The Japanese Treaty entered into force, and at that time Formosa was being administered by the Chinese Nationalist [Party (KMT)], to whom it was entrusted in 1945, as a military occupation ... This military occupancy could not give [the KMT] legal sovereignty.”
Ma of course knows all this. It is therefore not unreasonable to conclude that he is lying through his teeth, about a matter of law, specifically to deceive the very people that he serves as president.
His law degree has become a disgrace to the university that awarded it.
DON CROPPER
Taipei
Driving everyone crazy
As I crossed a tiny crosswalk in a minuscule alley and thought about writing on the moronic driving habits of Taipei motorists, I was forced to jump to the side to avoid a vehicle that made what can only be described as an attempt to inflict mortal harm on my person. The driver was busy texting and must not have seen me well enough to make contact. He was driving a little blue truck, and one must always be on the lookout for little blue trucks. However, I was ready.
Urban streets are always dangerous places, but what is so shocking about Taipei’s roads is how they transform the nicest, friendliest people in the world into barbarians. One almost expects rudeness from a Parisian or a New Yorker; not so from a Taiwanese. How can such wonderful, kind, compassionate people put up with this state of affairs?
There is no need to dwell on the idiotic stunts drivers pull day-in and day-out: ignoring double-yellow lines, no-parking signs, stoplights, courtesy, laws and the dictates of common sense.
To be fair, being rude and lawless pays off. Nice drivers are last — last to cross an intersection, to make a turn and to get where they’re going. Heaven help you if you stop for a pedestrian on a cross-walk; horns will sound and a taxi will swerve around you and ignore the pedestrian you have lured into the street — even the pedestrian will be puzzled by your consideration.
Clearly, police have little authority and get no respect. For years, I’ve watched as motorists flaunt the rules of the road while officers stand by and do nothing but toot their -whistle. Drivers who get pulled over and slapped with a NT$7,500 fine for making an illegal turn — as happens to drivers in cities with safer and saner roads — tend not to make any more illegal turns. That is also true for illegal parking and just about everything else. Why do passengers respect the rules in the MRT? It’s because the rules are enforced.
The inadequate, poorly designed infrastructure in Taipei encourages bad driving habits. Who forgot to put in the right and left turn lanes and parking lots? It is difficult to enforce the “no parking” and “no stopping” epidemic without providing enough public parking. Ironically, approximately half of the lanes in Taipei are unusable because the illegally parked cars render driving in the right-hand lane impractical — or impossible.
Recently, a person struck and killed one of my colleagues as he crossed the street. This was a tragic accident, but given the dog-eat-dog world of Taipei’s streets, it is no accident at all that the streets are littered with twisted metal and tainted with blood. Even at their best, the roads are horrible places to be. It’s time to change that.
RICHARD HARTZELL
Taipei
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS