Revoke Ma’s law degree
Harvard University needs to think about revoking President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) law degree. The man knows there is no basis in international law for his repeated assertion that the Cairo Declaration and subsequent instruments somehow transferred sovereignty of Taiwan to the Republic of China (ROC) (“Ma sees lessons from victory in war of resistance,” Oct. 26, page 1).
In fact, the record is 100 percent clear. Japan was relieved of sovereignty over Taiwan on April 28, 1952, the day that the Allied peace treaty with Japan, the San Francisco Peace Treaty, came into force. Taiwan then entered a state of suspended sovereignty and remains so to this day. The allies did indeed acquiesce in the ROC’s “exercise of authority” over Taiwan from 1945 to 1952, as Ma notes, but at no point during that period was sovereignty transferred away from Japan.
Ma invokes a single statement by former US president Harry Truman in early 1950 to vindicate the ROC’s claim to Taiwan, but he ignores dozens of equally authoritative statements by allied leaders and governments, including other statements by Truman, that directly contradict the ROC line.
The allied position on Taiwan was summarized for the British parliament, in 1955, by then-British Foreign Office junior minister R. H. Turton as: “Formosa[’s] sovereignty was Japanese until 1952. The Japanese Treaty entered into force, and at that time Formosa was being administered by the Chinese Nationalist [Party (KMT)], to whom it was entrusted in 1945, as a military occupation ... This military occupancy could not give [the KMT] legal sovereignty.”
Ma of course knows all this. It is therefore not unreasonable to conclude that he is lying through his teeth, about a matter of law, specifically to deceive the very people that he serves as president.
His law degree has become a disgrace to the university that awarded it.
DON CROPPER
Taipei
Driving everyone crazy
As I crossed a tiny crosswalk in a minuscule alley and thought about writing on the moronic driving habits of Taipei motorists, I was forced to jump to the side to avoid a vehicle that made what can only be described as an attempt to inflict mortal harm on my person. The driver was busy texting and must not have seen me well enough to make contact. He was driving a little blue truck, and one must always be on the lookout for little blue trucks. However, I was ready.
Urban streets are always dangerous places, but what is so shocking about Taipei’s roads is how they transform the nicest, friendliest people in the world into barbarians. One almost expects rudeness from a Parisian or a New Yorker; not so from a Taiwanese. How can such wonderful, kind, compassionate people put up with this state of affairs?
There is no need to dwell on the idiotic stunts drivers pull day-in and day-out: ignoring double-yellow lines, no-parking signs, stoplights, courtesy, laws and the dictates of common sense.
To be fair, being rude and lawless pays off. Nice drivers are last — last to cross an intersection, to make a turn and to get where they’re going. Heaven help you if you stop for a pedestrian on a cross-walk; horns will sound and a taxi will swerve around you and ignore the pedestrian you have lured into the street — even the pedestrian will be puzzled by your consideration.
Clearly, police have little authority and get no respect. For years, I’ve watched as motorists flaunt the rules of the road while officers stand by and do nothing but toot their -whistle. Drivers who get pulled over and slapped with a NT$7,500 fine for making an illegal turn — as happens to drivers in cities with safer and saner roads — tend not to make any more illegal turns. That is also true for illegal parking and just about everything else. Why do passengers respect the rules in the MRT? It’s because the rules are enforced.
The inadequate, poorly designed infrastructure in Taipei encourages bad driving habits. Who forgot to put in the right and left turn lanes and parking lots? It is difficult to enforce the “no parking” and “no stopping” epidemic without providing enough public parking. Ironically, approximately half of the lanes in Taipei are unusable because the illegally parked cars render driving in the right-hand lane impractical — or impossible.
Recently, a person struck and killed one of my colleagues as he crossed the street. This was a tragic accident, but given the dog-eat-dog world of Taipei’s streets, it is no accident at all that the streets are littered with twisted metal and tainted with blood. Even at their best, the roads are horrible places to be. It’s time to change that.
RICHARD HARTZELL
Taipei
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS