Xi Jinping’s ‘assertiveness’
Although it would be easy to portray Chinese Vice President Xi Jinping (習近平) as an “assertive future leader,” as Lin Cho-shui (林濁水) does (“China’s assertive future leader,” Oct. 27, page 8), one cannot as a necessity attach this to Xi’s time in the military. This equation is problematic for several reasons.
First, growth in Chinese military budget numbers as well as growing Chinese international assertiveness and vocal nationalism have taken place, oddly, during the post-Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) period. Deng’s military stature alone allowed him to underfund the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) during the 1970s and 1980s. Deng’s military reputation alone allowed him to take measures that effectively downsized the PLA, something his civilian successors would probably have been unable to do even if the international situation had permitted them to do so.
Let’s not forget, either, that the most strident Chinese actions toward Taiwan since the 1960s occurred on former Chinese president Jiang Zemin’s (江澤民) watch during the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis of 1995-1996. The missile tests and bellicose behavior originated at least in part from military pressure on Jiang and his need to demonstrate, as a civilian leader, his military resolve. Deng could have, although at some political cost, put down protest within the military and survived politically, but such actions from Jiang would have been political suicide.
Moreover, documents with the most threatening language toward Taiwan since the reforms in China began three decades ago, the 2000 Defense White Paper (also during the Jiang period) and the 2005 “Anti-Secession” Law, under Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤), were also formulated and published under civilian, not military, leadership.
PLA budget growth began after Tiananmen and accelerated rapidly under civilian, not military, leadership. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been at pains to professionalize the military and further civilianize control of the party. In this context, Xi’s assertiveness has more to do with the civilian aspects of his background than his military service. And even if one were to focus on his military background, one would find it dwarfed by the status of Deng.
To equate international assertiveness with a military background is, therefore, a mistake. It means more for a former soldier with combat experience than a peace activist to say, “War is hell.” In any case, Xi has no combat experience and he lacks the stature of Deng. And serving as a secretary in the Central Military Commission is far from being a grunt, little less a general. To point to his modest military record and say it is the cause of his occasional flashes of international assertiveness is to ignore a good deal of the evidence and to lack a bit of common sense.
NATHAN NOVAK
Kaohsiung
Diagnosis: politician
From where I sit, it would appear that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is afflicted with the same “disease” many politicians here in the US have — it’s called “foot in mouth.”
This is an affliction that stems from making statements without really thinking them through first.
Case in point: former Alaska governor and US vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin claiming that she “could see Russia from her back door.”
Virtually impossible!
President Ma is fluent in the English language.
He has been an interpreter for former president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國). He is a graduate of Harvard Law School — and they most certainly do not teach in Chinese at Harvard.
Could it be that what we are seeing are Freudian slips? Just a word of advice: Mr President, before you speak, think it through first!
TOM KULECK
Jordan, Minnesota
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS