A few days after Rajiv Shah was sworn in as the head of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), he stopped by to see its rapid response center, a high-tech command post for disaster relief, which on that day stood empty and still.
Twelve hours later, an earthquake hit Haiti, and for the next two months the center became Shah’s round-the-clock home. Shah, a 37-year-old physician with little government experience, suddenly found himself coordinating a desperate emergency relief effort under the gaze of US President Barack Obama.
The pace has barely let up since: catastrophic floods in Pakistan, the surge of aid workers into Afghanistan, a top-to-bottom review of US foreign assistance — all have heavily involved Shah, turning him into one of the administration’s most visible foreign policy players.
However, for this politically astute son of Indian immigrants from Ann Arbor, Michigan, now the highest-ranking Indian--American in the administration, it is Shah’s ambitious campaign to rebuild USAID that will ultimately determine his success or failure in Washington.
“He’s inherited leadership of an agency that was nearly broken over the last two decades,” said Richard Holbrooke, the special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, who has testified alongside him on Capitol Hill.
While Holbrooke said Shah had a “limitless future,” he added, “He’s going to be tested like few others are in government.”
Interviews with several USAID employees suggest that Shah has begun to re-energize the agency over the past 10 months. His efforts recently got a major lift from the White House, which issued a new development policy that pledges to restore USAID as the premier US aid agency.
“The initial reaction was ‘Oh my God, he’s so young,’” said Pamela White, a 29-year veteran of USAID who just completed a tour as mission director in Liberia. “But that never bothered me. We desperately need to look up to someone who can put us in a position to be a worldwide leader in development.”
The heyday of USAID dates to before Shah was born. In 1968, it had 18,000 workers running -programs in Latin America, Southeast Asia and Africa — a vibrant legacy of former US president John Kennedy’s call for the US to reach beyond its borders. However, after years of debilitating budget cuts that drove away many talented people, the agency now has fewer than 9,000 employees.
During former US president George W. Bush’s administration, it lost its policy-making role to the US State Department. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who has pushed for a bigger civilian role in war zones, lamented recently that USAID had become a glorified contracting agency.
As the agency has withered, wealthy private philanthropic organizations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have taken its place as leaders in development. So it is perhaps no accident that Shah is an alumnus of the Gates Foundation, where he ran its agriculture program and developed a US$1.5 billion fund to finance vaccinations.
“There were things we were able to do at the Gates Foundation that were super-exciting,” Shah said in an interview. “You could actually say: ‘OK, my goal is to solve AIDS, and how would you solve AIDS analytically?’ You didn’t have to worry about the politics.”
At the same time, Shah acknowledges he was always drawn to the political arena.
The son of an engineer for Ford Motor Co and a school administrator, he graduated from the University of Michigan and the University of Pennsylvania medical school, but he soon became a health policy adviser to former US vice president Al Gore’s presidential campaign.
A staunch supporter of Obama’s candidacy, Shah said he viewed his election as a Kennedy moment — worth trading weekend hikes in Washington State for the Beltway slog of Washington. His wife, Shivam Mallick Shah, has a senior post in the Department of Education.
“I’m a chronic complainer when we’re not in power,” Shah said of his decision to join the government. “I believe that these moments in history, when you have this kind of president, are rare.”
A soft-spoken man with a toothy, but almost bashful, smile, Shah can be deferential in public appearances with higher-level officials but he is not shy about his plans, saying he seeks to bring better monitoring and analytical rigor to the agency. Some programs, he noted, get financed year after year, even if they are failing.
He wants to implant Gates-style entrepreneurialism, championing ideas that come from beyond its usual circle of contractors. At town-hall meetings, Shah is equal parts evangelist and wonk, talking about USAID’s future while larding his vocabulary with corporate-speak words like “metrics.”
“He’s very dynamic and very smart, but he’s got a huge bureaucracy he’s fighting against, and a lot of vested interests,” said Martin Fisher, the chief executive of KickStart, a nonprofit organization that makes a low-cost pump to irrigate fields.
Shah also has to contend with a boss, US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has a deep interest in development and has largely won an internal administration debate over whether USAID should be more independent or stay under the influence of the US State Department.
Holbrooke, for example, still signs off on aid for Afghanistan and Pakistan — an authority he picked up because USAID was leaderless for months and because, he said, the programs there were a mess.
The US State Department has almost finished an exhaustive, year-long review of diplomacy and development. The review will reinforce USAID’s expanded role, but lash it even more firmly to the US State Department.
“To the extent that State maintains firm control over USAID, it can make it difficult for any agency to revitalize itself,” said Connie Veillette, director of the program for rethinking foreign assistance at the Center for Global Development, an independent research group.
“USAID needs to have a stronger voice,” she said.
However, there are advantages to being so closely aligned with Clinton. USAID is seeking funds to hire an additional 1,200 Foreign Service officers and few people have as much clout on Capitol Hill as Clinton.
Shah said critics in development circles were too focused on organizational charts; what matters is that he is in sync with Clinton and Holbrooke. Clinton has become his strongest champion, according to one of her senior advisers, Philippe Reines.
The agency has also managed to wrest back some control, setting up its own policy-planning shop and a small budget office.
With USAID engaged in so many places, many of Shah’s headaches stem from being too much in demand. The agency has nearly 400 US personnel in Afghanistan, which has made it difficult to fill jobs in Africa.
Shah himself spends a quarter of his time on Afghanistan, but like other senior officials he plays down expectations.
“We have to be honest with ourselves about what is the goal of different programs,” he said.
As he learns the ropes, Shah has other influential backers, not least Obama, who got to know him during meetings about the Haiti crisis in the White House Situation Room and announced the new development policy himself at the UN.
“As a government, we have a coherent strategy for the first time since JFK,” said David Beckmann, president of Bread for the World, which advocates for aid to alleviate hunger and poverty. “The only good thing that came out of the Haiti earthquake is that it raised Raj Shah to be a partner of the president.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers