Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) has attracted the attention of every media outlet after winning this year’s Nobel Peace Prize. Every word he ever uttered has become an indicator of China’s political direction. However, if we really want to judge the impact of Liu’s award on Chinese politics, we must look into other changes in China. Some other news might be even more significant and should not be ignored.
For example, Boxun News Network reported that some former senior officials within the system, led by Li Rui (李銳), a former secretary to Mao Zedong (毛澤東), and Hu Jiwei (胡績偉), a former president of the People’s Daily, submitted a joint open letter to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Oct. 11. The letter was titled “Implement Article 35 of the Constitution, abolish pre-publication censorship and implement citizens’ speech and press freedom.” There is nothing special in the letter itself, since such calls are often heard, but a look at the cosigners implies that things are indeed changing.
In addition to Li and Hu, the signators include some former Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials who have constantly advocated democracy, such as Jiang Ping (江平), a former president of People’s University of China, and Zhong Peizhang (鐘沛璋), a former director of the Theory Bureau of the Publicity Department. More deserving of our attention, however, were the names of some former high officials that also appeared on the list. They were all new faces that had never before participated in such calls for political reform.
These included Zhou Shaoming (周紹明), a former deputy director of the Political Department of the Guangzhou Military Region; Zhang Zhongpei (張忠培), a former head of the Palace Museum; Hu Fuchen (胡甫臣), a former director and editor-in-chief of the China Worker’s Publishing House; Wang Yongcheng (王永成), a professor at Shanghai Jiaotong University; and Yu Yueting (俞月亭), a former director of Fujian Television.
Perhaps the appearance of these new faces was a result of the “Liu Xiaobo effect,” greatly encouraging the pro-democracy camp in China. Thanks to the international community’s firm support, they now have great confidence in their call for democracy and have greater courage to achieve it.
We know that totalitarian regimes use the trick of spreading fear among the public. Following this line of reasoning, if the public one day loses its fear and tears off its mask, that would be the end of the totalitarian regime.
This is why Liu is so important: He has bravely sacrificed himself to win global support, and by doing this, he encourages and inspires others. This letter is a sign of it.
Wang Dan is a visiting assistant professor in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences at National Tsing Hua University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers