In the recent dispute between China and Japan over a collision between a Chinese fishing boat and a Japanese vessel off the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), Japan did the US a favor by covering up its lack of political resolve. However, if we think in more positive terms, the way in which Japan started out strong but eventually caved in to China had some merit because it helped reveal China’s hegemonic nature.
China’s behavior proves that the lives of people in China are worthless to their government — when they exercise their “constitutional rights” they are thrown in jail. Overseas, however, and especially in Japan, the lives of Chinese people do mean something to Beijing, which goes out of its way to protect its citizens, completely disregarding whether they are in the wrong.
China has proven to be a “nouveau riche” country that relies on its modern weapons with the righteousness of those who took part in the Boxer Rebellion in late imperial China. It will break any agreement, exchange or dialogue and interfere politically in economic activities in pursuit of its own ends. China can be neither trusted nor relied upon.
The Sino-Japanese dispute also reveals the indecisiveness, hypocrisy and incompetence of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his government. Ma, the “heroic protector” of the Diaoyutais, tries to paint himself as a “peacemaker” in order to cover up his surrender to China. He claims that the Republic of China’s (ROC) sovereignty encompasses China, yet we have not seen anyone stick an ROC national flag in Chinese ground to demonstrate this sovereignty.
When it comes to the Diaoyutais, however, Ma forgets his role as a “peacemaker” by sending patrol boats to protect activists trying to provoke Japan and declaring ROC sovereignty over the Diaoyutais.
Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) demonstrated his ignorance when he avoided diplomatic language such as “hoping for a peaceful resolution of the issue,” preferring instead to indirectly threaten Japan by saying that “Taiwan will not easily go to war with Japan,” as if Taiwan were a superpower instead of a nation that is only able to handle such issues through diplomatic means.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also used misleading information as it tried to “correct” foreign reports on what the US and Japanese foreign ministers had said at their meeting on Sept. 23. The ministry said US Department of State spokesman Philip Crowley, in a press briefing about the meeting, reiterated that “We don’t take a position on the sovereignty of the Senkakus [Diaoyutais].” This was in fact Crowley’s response to a question, not a statement made by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton at the meeting.
Crowley’s explanation of the talks mentioned that both sides stressed the importance of the US-Japan Alliance. He also said Japan’s foreign minister “indicated that Japan was working this in accordance with both its legal process and international law. The secretary’s response was simply to encourage dialogue and hope that the issue can be resolved soon since relations between Japan and China are vitally important to regional stability.”
The ministry dares not face the fact that the US-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security has always included the Ryukyu Islands, in which the Diaoyutais could be included, both during the period of US trusteeship and after they were returned to Japan by the US.
Instead, the ministry chose to dishonestly stress that the US does not take a position on the sovereignty of the Diaoyutais.
The ministry, fooling no one, is only embarrassing itself.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
In a Taiwanese university classroom, a lecturer asks in English: “Can anyone give me an example from Taiwan?” Students look down. No one answers. After class, one student writes on the course platform in Mandarin: “I understood the concept, but I didn’t know how to answer in English.” That moment highlights a key issue in Taiwan’s English-medium instruction (EMI) reform: It is not just about more English-taught courses, but whether students can learn, participate and belong. EMI expansion is part of the Bilingual 2030 policy and the Ministry of Education’s BEST Program, aiming to improve English ability, support EMI teaching
The Ministry of the Interior, working with the navy and coast guard, is organizing Taiwan’s first joint exercise simulating escort tankers carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil through a Chinese blockade. The drills simulate fuel transport along three maritime corridors leading toward Japan, the Philippines and the US. Deputy Minister of the Interior Sawyer Mars (馬士元) said that a blockade of the Taiwan Strait would amount to “almost a 100 percent blockade of the regional energy supply.” Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo said planning to counter a blockade is standard practice in Taipei. While the exercise is limited in
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
RSS