Over the last week, local politics has been the hottest topic in Taiwan. Several opinion polls have shown that the approval ratings of Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) have dropped and that his chances don’t look too good for the upcoming elections because of recent procurement scandals surrounding the Taipei International Flora Expo and the Xinsheng Overpass reconstruction project. Some people have even urged Hau to withdraw from the election.
CommonWealth magazine recently released the results of a survey rating 25 mayors and county commissioners. The results showed that the top six spots were occupied by mayors and commissioners belonging to the pan-green camp, while the bottom 12 positions were occupied by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) incumbents. While opinion polls are not elections, they are a reflection of voter sentiment.
The opinions about local leaders reflected in these polls conform to democratic common sense, reflect public sentiment and, as such, are important.
There are individual and unique reasons why mayors and commissioners have different levels of approval. However, t that the opinion poll results were so uniform is clearly a reflection of the direction of mainstream public opinion. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) sees this as reaffirmation that the public feels that a pan-green government is a guarantee for good quality governance and that they are more capable at ruling than the KMT. In comparison, these approval ratings have become a source of embarrassment for the KMT, which is now complaining of unfair treatment, and the Taipei City Government, which has conceded it may not have been so good at marketing itself. The Taipei County Government, ranking last, says it “cannot understand the poll results.”
It is clear that the view that the KMT is better able to govern was a misconception that has now been proven wrong. From the national level down to the local level, the KMT is unwilling to face public opinion and now finds itself coming up with various excuses to defend itself.
The above-mentioned approval ratings of mayors and county commissioners should be interpreted based on democratic common sense. In other words, the main reason DPP mayors and commissioners perform better is that in most localities, the ruling DPP is in a minority while the KMT is in the majority. Regardless of whether the DPP is in charge, they are in a minority on the city and county councils in all the 25 cities and counties, which means that the KMT controls all these local councils. The administrations of pan-green mayors and county commissioners are thus subject to strict monitoring and the party — which still hasn’t reached its 25th year of existence — has never controlled the courts or the media.
As a result, it must remain cautious and never become lazy. That is why — regardless of whether it is dealing with public interests or local development issues — DPP leaders manage to meet public demands and fulfill their responsibilities. In comparison, the KMT, with their control over the local councils, is rarely subject to checks and balances from popular institutions or the media. Over time, this has distanced the party from the public, thereby creating a rift between its policies and public expectations.
Appropriate checks and balances make a democracy more effective, while a lack of them leads to political irregularities. Based on this democratic reasoning, it is not hard to understand Hau’s current behavior. Taipei City is viewed as a pan-blue stronghold, the city has been ruled by KMT mayors for the last 12 years, they have all won with a large margin, and the pan-blue camp controls the city council — this has made the Hau administration feel that its re-election is a matter of course. With such a government, it is very easy for problems like administrative bureaucracy, arrogance, incompetence and corruption to rear their ugly heads.
After Hau came into office, there have been problems with the Maokong Gondola, the Wenhu MRT Line, the Xinsheng Overpass reconstruction, the bicycle path along Dunhua Road, the road-repaving project and even the recently installed cylinder-shaped bus stop signs.
These inconveniences to the public are a waste of public funds and a major source of public discontent. In the scandal surrounding the Flora Expo, the public has seen how government officials freely spend public funds while ignoring standard procurement procedures. As soon as something goes wrong, senior officials, including the deputy mayor, have responded with arrogance, stubborn arguments and with distorting facts, and have even threatened to take legal action against those who reveal the irregularities. Our great mayor never knows anything about these incidents or is the last one to find out. This makes one wonder how long Taipei residents will be able to put up with this.
It must be stressed that such developments occurring on the local level are also happening, but on an even worse scale, in the central government. It was only because the KMT won the presidential election by a large majority and holds a two-thirds legislative majority, and because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) promised “full authority and full responsibility” that voters gave the KMT such a huge responsibility.
However, it was not because the DPP administration did poorly, but because voters were tired of the infighting resulting from the then-KMT opposition’s control of the legislature that hampered national governance. Without sufficient checks and balances, the Ma administration and its incompetence and arrogance is destroying the economy, causing democracy to regress and kicking national defense to the backburner. They have used the goodwill of voters as an excuse to issue pro-China policies, while the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) is a piece of one-party legislation placing the Republic of China in an extremely precarious position even within its own borders. These are the real reasons behind Ma’s low approval ratings.
The direction of public opinion as reflected in these opinion polls is in line with common sense. Beginning with the upcoming special municipality elections, Taiwanese must express their opinions with their ballots. The day when voters express their opinion is the day when Taiwanese democracy will enter a new level of maturity.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS