The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) are working together again and this time it seems that they’re competing to see which is the most Chinese. Neither side is beyond stooping to historical revisionism, instigating fights with neighboring countries or brainwashing their people in pursuit of this goal. It’s a tit-for-tat war of words and deeds that will soon have both sides claiming to be the sole inventor of the printing press, gunpowder and the compass.
Launching this most recent round of vitriol was an editorial by CCP mouthpiece the People’s Daily claiming that the CCP was the true slayer of the Japanese Imperial Army in World War II and that the upstart KMT did little in the fight to save the motherland. The KMT’s own President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) responded on Soldier’s Day by saying that no, it was actually the KMT who defeated the Japanese. He went on to say: “The public must not forget about this period, nor should we allow the history to be altered or distorted,” without at all seeing the irony in what he was saying. It doesn’t take two semesters of world history to know that a substantial portion of the Chinese world would be speaking Japanese now if it weren’t for the bombs rained down on Japan by US planes. Neither the KMT nor the CCP took back Taiwan or any part of the mainland — they were handed over to them by the US.
This united historical revisionism doesn’t just stop at vilifying the Japanese. The KMT is now following in the CCP’s footsteps by rewriting history books as well. On Tuesday, the Ministry of Education unveiled its new pet project to brainwash the youth of Taiwan, namely a revised history curriculum that doubles the amount of Chinese history taught at the expense of both local and world history. It makes one wonder how the edited history textbooks will approach World War II. Will the US even play a role in the text, or will it be a unified Chinese nation that whipped that cur, the Japanese?
The CCP and the KMT aren’t going to simply stop there. Now they’re riling up a fresh dispute with Japan over some extremely important rocks in the East China Sea, saying that it’s a simple matter of fishermen’s rights. After all, doesn’t the united Chinese nation have a claim to any and all territory near its borders, or where any person with a trace of Chinese descent once lived? Ignore the fact that the Ryukyu Islands are part of a contiguous chain that has long been inhabited by Japanese and that they have been used in the past by the US to mount attacks on the Japanese mainland, or that they could be used now to deny US Navy access to eastern Taiwan, and you might wonder what the big fuss is about. The KMT usually claims that it’s just about fish and sovereignty, but it’s obvious that the reasons for sending coast guard vessels to eyeball the Japanese go a lot deeper than that, especially coming so soon after a similar Chinese standoff.
What all this appears to constitute is the dawn of a Third United Front between the erstwhile enemy parties. The First United Front from 1924 to 1927 saw the CCP and KMT working together to end the era of warlordism in China, while in the Second United Front they just agreed to quit shooting openly at each other to fight the invading Japanese instead. In this third, unwritten united front, the goals of the CCP and KMT are unification and regional hegemony. They’ve already gone a long way down the unification road with the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) — and more agreements are sure to follow — and now we are seeing a hint as to the direction these parties will take to gain regional hegemony.
However, KMT leaders should read their history books well, because neither of the first two united fronts worked out in the end, especially with both sides trying to out-Chinese each other and rule the nation they believe is theirs alone.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas