As Beijing marked the 65th anniversary of the victory over Japan, the “outstanding leadership” of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was mentioned, but not a word was said about the role of the nationalist army in yet another Chinese rejection of the Republic of China (ROC).
Apparently, there is no longer any room for the ROC in the CCP’s interpretation of “one China,” and this spells immeasurable uncertainty for cross-strait relations.
The Chinese leadership in Zhongnanhai has frequently been critical of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) lately, both openly and indirectly. This was probably the most severe instance of such criticism, with its complete disregard of the CCP-KMT forum. China simply will not allow Ma the opportunity to continue using his political rhetoric as they prod him on toward political negotiations and a substantive response to China’s demands for a mechanism for establishing mutual cross-strait military confidence-building mechanism and the signing of a peace agreement.
Zhongnanhai’s displeasure with Ma is nothing new. They will not let Ma use China’s promise to forgo benefits in connection with the signing of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) as an excuse to avoid political talks, since that is not in line with the promises made at the KMT-CCP forum.
Early last month, Beijing sent Chinese Assistant Minister of the Taiwan Affairs Office Li Yafei (李亞飛) to Taiwan.
Li made it clear that the so-called “1992 consensus” means that “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait both adhere to the one China principle,” whereas Ma continued to insist that it means “one China with each side having its own interpretation” of what that China is.
He also said that “one China means the Republic of China. There is no two ways about it.”
At first, Beijing thought this was mere electoral rhetoric, but they later found that Ma can no longer control the forces that oppose him and favor Taiwan.
This is causing problems for Hu, who has to step down in 2012 and is coming under fire from Chinese hawks who say the current situation is tantamount to “peaceful secession.”
This could lead to changes in Zhongnanhai’s strategy.
On a recent visit to China, two high US officials, Larry Summers — director of the National Economic Council and former secretary of the treasury — and Deputy National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon, found that Beijing is being “pointedly cold” and said this implies an upcoming shift in Sino-US relations.
As for Taiwan, the US and Japan are indirectly critical of Ma’s pro-Chinese policies, in particular after a People’s Liberation Army (PLA) general struck right at the heart of US worries by saying that “these weapons will be ours sooner or later, since Taiwan will return to the Motherland sooner or later.”
In terms of military power, Taiwan is no longer an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” and Ma is distancing himself from the US and Japan in favor of China, thus also distancing himself from other democracies. Beijing is jumping at the opportunity to press Taiwan into cooperating with China to rebuild Taiping Island (太平島). Unless the US is able to stabilize the situation, Taiwan’s territorial demands in the area will soon be history.
When it comes down to it, Ma is weak, incapable and living in his own dream world — eventual unification — and in his naivete, he places excessive hope on the ECFA. This tells Beijing that it can take what it wants.
When Ma is saying there will be “no unification, no independence, no war” he is only talking to himself.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan’s Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big