Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) was about to celebrate one year in office when he received an unwelcome “gift:” CommonWealth magazine’s poll on public satisfaction with the mayors and county commissioners of 25 cities and counties gave the six top spots to Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) members. Even the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) model leader, Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強), fell 13 spots to 18th.
Although the survey ranks the political performance of local leaders, national administrative efficiency is the basis for the ranking.
Pan-blue commentators said the party “would reflect on and review” the situation, while KMT spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) said the problem was that the government hadn’t done enough to promote its achievements. Taipei City Government spokeswoman Chao Hsin-ping (趙心屏) couldn’t understand how Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) was ranked 21st and the city placed fifth from the bottom, when it had obtained the top rankings in the areas of economy, policy implementation, education and social welfare. The KMT’s attitude highlights its problem.
Miaoli County Commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻), once called a “five-star county commissioner,” fell from third place last year to No. 15 this year. This was undoubtedly the result of his handling of the seizure of Dapu bourough (大埔) farmland. Nor is there much doubt that Hu’s fall from grace was the result of the assassination of alleged gangster Weng Chi-nan (翁奇楠), which has caused city residents to worry about deteriorating social order. Hau is caught up in a scandal over the Taipei International Flora Expo, where “simple administrative mistakes” have developed into a perfect storm of “collective corruption.”
Elected KMT officials have serious problems with governing, handling crises and their attitudes toward the public. To say they do poorly in opinion polls because they don’t promote their achievements very well is a clear bid to divert attention. It’s no wonder their popularity has been dropping.
The main difference between pan-blue and pan-green politicians lies in their attitude toward the public and this is reflected in their support levels. The most important thing for pan-green leaders seems to be what the electorate — not civil servants — think.
When he was Yilan County commissioner, Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) kept an eye on construction projects and made sure everything was above board. When former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was Taipei mayor, he would visit city offices to make sure that nobody was shying off work. Chen’s visits made civil servants unhappy and they complained about a lack of respect, but Chen was popular with the public.
Most pan-blue politicians, on the other hand, come from the ranks of the bureaucracy and view civil servants and other officials as “family.” They see themselves more as public administrators than public servants. That is why, when prosecutors searched Taipei City Government offices over the flower scandal and started detaining officials, Hau went to the city’s New Construction Office to apologize for getting civil servants embroiled in his re-election campaign, rather than apologizing to the public first. Liu’s indifference to the plight of the Dapu farmers tarnished the reputation he had taken years to build.
KMT politicians complain the public doesn’t appreciate their achievements, but that’s because there is a gap between what they say and do and what the public wants. Thus, Wu and others can talk about governing for the grassroots, but as soon as a policy causes a rift between businesses and farmers, or confrontation between development and environmental interests, the KMT sides with big business and China.
Eight years out of power and just two years back in, the KMT government is back to its old ways. Why shouldn’t the public show its disdain?
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
Last month, two major diplomatic events unfolded in Southeast Asia that suggested subtle shifts in the region’s strategic landscape. The 46th ASEAN Summit and the inaugural ASEAN-Gulf-Cooperation Council (GCC)-China Trilateral Summit in Kuala Lumpur coincided with French President Emmanuel Macron’s high-profile visits to Vietnam, Indonesia and Singapore. Together, they highlighted ASEAN’s maturing global posture, deepening regional integration and China’s intensifying efforts to recalibrate its economic diplomacy amid uncertainties posed by the US. The ASEAN summit took place amid rising protectionist policies from the US, notably sweeping tariffs on goods from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, with duties as high as 49 percent.
RSS