Late last month, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) nominated Central Election Committee (CEC) Chairman Rai Hau-min (賴浩敏) as the Judicial Yuan president and former National Communications Commission chairman Su Yeong-chin (蘇永欽) as his deputy to promote judicial reform.
The arrangement makes it clear that Ma wants Rai to function as a figurehead, while Su will follow Ma’s orders and take control of the judiciary. However, Ma’s plan could fail this time.
Taiwan was in danger when the UN issued it’s death sentence on the Republic of China (ROC) in 1971. The following year, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) appointed his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) as premier to push for reform. He also promoted several Taiwanese people to figurehead positions at that time. Among the appointees were Tai Yen-hui (戴炎輝), Weng Yueh-sheng (翁岳生) and Chen Shih-jun (陳世榮), three people from the legal field who were often criticized by young lawyers.
DIFFERING VIEWS
Because of a sense of crisis and the divinization by the media monopoly, the younger Chiang came to be known as a reformer. However, then-deputy US ambassador to Taipei William Gleysteen took a different view. After a meeting with 12 young Taiwanese academics, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members and businesspeople, he found that their views of the younger Chiang seemed to differ from those of the general public.
These young Taiwanese believed the purpose of the younger Chiang’s personnel arrangements were to consolidate power, as he merely recognized that Taiwanese deserved greater participation through tacit agreement.
They were opposed to this kind of empty symbolic reform that made superficial use of Taiwanese, and were determined to organize an effective force to counterbalance the government in the hope that one day, Taiwanese would be able to regain control of Taiwan from the KMT and Mainlanders.
DIFFICULT CHOICE
Ma’s nomination of 71-year-old Rai is reminiscent of the younger Chiang’s methods. What he really wants is to promote Su, not Rai, but if he were to nominate Su directly, Mainlanders would control three of the five yuans if the nomination were approved. Ma thus has no choice but to nominate Rai as a figurehead.
Despite Ma’s arrangement, he may be unaware that Rai was one of the 12 young Taiwanese with whom Gleysteen met.
As Rai is expected to become the new Judicial Yuan president and a grand justice 38 years after his criticism, Taiwanese have the right to expect that he stick to the ideals of his youth and push for judicial reform instead of following in the footsteps of Tai, Weng and Chen and enjoy his remaining years.
The lawyers from Rai’s generation were all deeply aware of Taiwan’s corrupt judicial system. These three major problems — KMT manipulation, government interference and a public practicing bribery — remain unchanged to this day.
Since the KMT led by Ma regained power in 2008, the judiciary has adopted double standards to attack those with different views, and judicial corruption has become even more serious. Rai must face all these problems honestly, and make a brave push for reform.
Given that he had the insight and daring to criticize Chiang Ching-kuo, there is reason to hope that he will not become a figurehead of the Ma administration.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US