Late last month, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) nominated Central Election Committee (CEC) Chairman Rai Hau-min (賴浩敏) as the Judicial Yuan president and former National Communications Commission chairman Su Yeong-chin (蘇永欽) as his deputy to promote judicial reform.
The arrangement makes it clear that Ma wants Rai to function as a figurehead, while Su will follow Ma’s orders and take control of the judiciary. However, Ma’s plan could fail this time.
Taiwan was in danger when the UN issued it’s death sentence on the Republic of China (ROC) in 1971. The following year, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) appointed his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) as premier to push for reform. He also promoted several Taiwanese people to figurehead positions at that time. Among the appointees were Tai Yen-hui (戴炎輝), Weng Yueh-sheng (翁岳生) and Chen Shih-jun (陳世榮), three people from the legal field who were often criticized by young lawyers.
DIFFERING VIEWS
Because of a sense of crisis and the divinization by the media monopoly, the younger Chiang came to be known as a reformer. However, then-deputy US ambassador to Taipei William Gleysteen took a different view. After a meeting with 12 young Taiwanese academics, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) members and businesspeople, he found that their views of the younger Chiang seemed to differ from those of the general public.
These young Taiwanese believed the purpose of the younger Chiang’s personnel arrangements were to consolidate power, as he merely recognized that Taiwanese deserved greater participation through tacit agreement.
They were opposed to this kind of empty symbolic reform that made superficial use of Taiwanese, and were determined to organize an effective force to counterbalance the government in the hope that one day, Taiwanese would be able to regain control of Taiwan from the KMT and Mainlanders.
DIFFICULT CHOICE
Ma’s nomination of 71-year-old Rai is reminiscent of the younger Chiang’s methods. What he really wants is to promote Su, not Rai, but if he were to nominate Su directly, Mainlanders would control three of the five yuans if the nomination were approved. Ma thus has no choice but to nominate Rai as a figurehead.
Despite Ma’s arrangement, he may be unaware that Rai was one of the 12 young Taiwanese with whom Gleysteen met.
As Rai is expected to become the new Judicial Yuan president and a grand justice 38 years after his criticism, Taiwanese have the right to expect that he stick to the ideals of his youth and push for judicial reform instead of following in the footsteps of Tai, Weng and Chen and enjoy his remaining years.
The lawyers from Rai’s generation were all deeply aware of Taiwan’s corrupt judicial system. These three major problems — KMT manipulation, government interference and a public practicing bribery — remain unchanged to this day.
Since the KMT led by Ma regained power in 2008, the judiciary has adopted double standards to attack those with different views, and judicial corruption has become even more serious. Rai must face all these problems honestly, and make a brave push for reform.
Given that he had the insight and daring to criticize Chiang Ching-kuo, there is reason to hope that he will not become a figurehead of the Ma administration.
James Wang is a journalist based in Washington.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers