Reclaiming Taiwan
Your editorial description of Taiwan as an existing entity and the Republic of China (ROC) as an abstract idea that has been kept on life support for far too long is well to the point (“For the love of Taiwan, get it right,” Aug. 24, page 8).
According to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and common sense, the ROC perished when it lost the mainland in 1949. Legally, the ROC was only left with Kinmen and Matsu. Taiwan is not a territory of the ROC or the People’s Republic of China (PRC) according to the San Francisco Peace Treaty of 1951 and the Taipei Treaty of 1952.
Taiwan and the ROC are mismatched, and a mismatched couple seldom find happiness with each other. When the ROC was founded in 1911, Taiwan was not part of its territory. When the ROC was defeated by Chinese Communists, Taiwan served as a shelter for what remained of the ROC.
A shelter never becomes the territory of a government-in-exile. Under the ROC’s discriminatory and totalitarian rule, Taiwanese were treated as second-class citizens, massacred in the 228 Incident, suffered under the White Terror and endured 38 years of Martial Law — the longest in world history. Taiwan is now under the constant threat of PRC missiles and submarines, but the ROC cannot do anything.
With Taiwan still wearing the mask of the ROC and the PRC laying claim to the title of China, most of the world does not recognize Taiwan. That leaves Taiwan as the only major economy that is not recognized by the US, Japan, China, the EU, the UN and many other countries and organizations.
Your editorial suggests that Taiwanese should ask Ma and his followers whether they love Taiwan or the ROC. They “love” Taiwan only during elections. The truth is that they don’t really love Taiwan or the ROC at all. What Taiwanese should do is not vote for Ma and his followers in the five special municipal elections, the presidential election and the legislative election. Only through elections can Taiwanese reclaim Taiwan.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Using English with care
I recently saw a news report on a competition to find a new English slogan for the National Immigration Agency (NIA). I was astounded to read that a panel of judges had decided on a fifth-grade student’s slogan, “NIA care what you care.”
I couldn’t find a report on this in the Taipei Times, but I felt compelled to contact the English-language press to complain that this slogan makes no sense. Indeed, it is quite obvious that the panel of judges who chose the winning slogan did not include a single native English speaker.
It is an embarrassment to Taiwan that the NIA — the first point of contact for foreigners who plan to visit or live in Taiwan — has adopted such a slogan.
This sort of thing should never happen. The use of English by any government agency should be thoroughly checked and approved before being adopted — particularly in such a high-profile competition, reported on the national news.
As part of Taiwan’s English-language press, I am sure many of your staff would agree with me that this slogan should be changed immediately to prevent any further damage to Taiwan’s international reputation in terms of English language ability.
ANDREW CHARD
Hsinchu
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past