Pre-emptive strike option
Mark Stokes pointed out the usefulness of submarines in the defense of Taiwan (“Taiwan’s debate on submarine expansion resurfaces,” Aug. 23, page 3).
The so-called “porcupine strategy” proposed by US Naval War College professor William Murray for Taiwan’s defense was purely defensive and reactive. For a small country like Taiwan, which could be overwhelmed quickly by the massive opening salvos of a surprise attack, defense strategy must include “pre-emption” and “retaliation” capabilities. As former US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld said in his farewell speech at the Pentagon, “Weakness is provocative.”
Only by making an attack on Taiwan prohibitively costly is it possible to prevent war. Under this concept, submarines, as well as mobile missiles and multi-mission-capable Blackhawk helicopters, are an absolute necessity.
Submarines, not necessarily large ones (in fact, small ones may work better and be less costly for Taiwan), could be rotated for patrol and surveillance, and pre-emptively deployed to mine Chinese naval harbors. Though carrying only a smaller complement of missiles, when aimed at a few large, important targets like coastal cities or large dams, these could be sufficient to deter an invasion.
Taiwan should seek to build its own submarines. This would require infrastructure development and cooperation with private industry. Though difficult, these kinds of economic activities are exactly what Taiwan needs to rejuvenate its economy, especially heavy and high-tech industries, and this could also keep these industries in Taiwan as the foundation for further domestic industrial upgrading. Taiwanese legislators, could find it difficult to resist industrial development and job creation in their constituencies.
With submarines, mobile missiles and Blackhawk helicopters, Taiwan could build up its active defense capabilities and deter attack.
However, given President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) goal of eventual unification and the friendly Taiwan-China relations, the above “wishes” would be very difficult to realize, even when the increasing cross-strait military imbalance in Beijing’s favor is evident.
SEBO KOH,
Publisher of Taiwan Tribune,Strongsville, Ohio
In the past month, two important developments are poised to equip Taiwan with expanded capabilities to play foreign policy offense in an age where Taiwan’s diplomatic space is seriously constricted by a hegemonic Beijing. Taiwan Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) led a delegation of Taiwan and US companies to the Philippines to promote trilateral economic cooperation between the three countries. Additionally, in the past two weeks, Taiwan has placed chip export controls on South Africa in an escalating standoff over the placing of its diplomatic mission in Pretoria, causing the South Africans to pause and ask for consultations to resolve
An altercation involving a 73-year-old woman and a younger person broke out on a Taipei MRT train last week, with videos of the incident going viral online, sparking wide discussions about the controversial priority seats and social norms. In the video, the elderly woman, surnamed Tseng (曾), approached a passenger in a priority seat and demanded that she get up, and after she refused, she swung her bag, hitting her on the knees and calves several times. In return, the commuter asked a nearby passenger to hold her bag, stood up and kicked Tseng, causing her to fall backward and
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
RSS