Since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, his administration has set the economy right at the top of its agenda. Against all odds, the GDP has risen, and is expected to grow by 8 percent this year. However, little of this is trickling down to the general public and the poverty gap has widened. According to the latest Cabinet figures, there is a 66-fold wealth disparity in Taiwan this year, an all-time high.
In 2008, those in the top 5 percent of the income pyramid enjoyed, on average, an annual income of NT$4.5 million (US$140,530). The bottom 5 percent only earned an average of NT$68,000. In 1998, the highest incomes were only 32 times more than the lowest.
Unemployment shot up as a result of the financial crisis and the salaries of those who managed to keep their jobs fell. Middle and low-income earners were hit badly, but the fat cats were left sitting pretty. Now that the economy is improving at an encouraging 8 percent rate, we are still not seeing a concomitant increase in salaries. To exacerbate the situation, commodity prices have been rising, pushing up the price of goods on the shelf. Middle and low-income workers are, therefore, being hit with a double whammy.
The culprit is evidently the triangular trade model in which orders are received in Taiwan and the goods manufactured in China. The percentage of trade carried out in this way has risen from 13 percent in 2000 to 50 percent in June this year. As a result, exporters and their shareholders, not the general public, are seeing the fruits of this economic growth. The poor struggle to make ends meet and the rich continue to get richer on the back of the labors of the poor.
This problem has been worsened by a big cut in inheritance, business and income taxes. Instead of investing the resulting surplus in productive industries, the rich have been speculating in real estate, pushing property prices higher. The cost of a home in Taipei City now equates to more than 11 years of salary for the average employee. People who don’t already own a home have no hope of ever owning one, and this hopelessness is fueling popular resentment.
A widening income gap has many undesirable results. It is generally accompanied by increasing disparity between regions, especially between urban and rural areas. These two factors chase one another, forming a vicious cycle. Second, upward mobility is slowed down or choked off completely. People with lower incomes despair of ever improving their lot. Such people feel trapped and exploited, leading eventually to grave social crises. The recent wave of resentment toward big business is a sign of this growing discontent.
One of the roles of government is to uphold social justice by distributing the fruits of economic development. The Ma administration stresses economic growth, but only the rich are gaining from it. Meanwhile, the middle and working classes are feeling increasingly exploited. Now that Taiwan and China have signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), working people in Taiwan face even more direct competition from Chinese commodities and labor.
The government’s economic policies have just added fuel to the fire. The more the government pushes for economic growth, the more working people feel they are losing out relative to the wealthy minority. The income gap is creating an M-shaped society in which the middle class is eroding. The result is a loss of social cohesion and a breakdown of consensus that supports the existing social order. As the state loses its moral authority, we are likely to see growing discontent and social unrest. The ever-widening income gap will be an important issue in the November special municipality elections. If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government fails to deal with this issue, it could face a major upset at the polls.
Belgians, like Taiwanese, often get told that their country does not exist. My memories of early adult life in Brussels have served me well in Taiwan. When I first landed in the city of Kaohsiung, I had the strange feeling that I was going back home. At the time, I was living in Australia, but Kaohsiung felt much closer to Brussels than Sydney ever did. I know first-hand the feeling of being told that one’s country is not a real country. In my case, it came from UK politician Nigel Farage — who told the European parliament in 2018 that
“Did you know that Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) was an American citizen?” The question was posed over dinner a few weeks ago by a colleague of ours. Of us all, he is by far the best Mandarin speaker and encyclopedic in all things Chinese. For decades, we have gathered quarterly for martinis, early dinner and diplomatic war stories in Rosslyn, Virginia, a few blocks from the Washington, DC headquarters of the American Institute in Taiwan. In the 1970s, we were young diplomats and attaches together at the US Embassy in Taipei and later in Beijing. We all are retired now, yet
Micron Technology Inc and its South Korean peers face an intractable problem. With data centers for artificial intelligence gobbling up supplies of their memory chips, there are not enough to go around. This scarcity is forcing up memory prices and making Micron, SK Hynix Inc and Samsung Electronics Co astonishingly profitable. But customers are unhappy, governments could intervene and shortages may open the door to Chinese rivals. As recently as 2023, memory manufacturers were suffering huge losses as demand and selling prices collapsed. This is still a cyclical industry but I think the bigger risk right now is this trio
Chinese university academics convening at Jinan University in China’s Guangzhou Province on June 30 “unanimously concluded” that the Batanes Islands, the Philippines’ northernmost province, is a “natural geographical extension of Taiwan.” As Beijing claims Taiwan, the argument runs, the Batanes belongs to China as well. Consider the architecture. Premise one: Taiwan belongs to China. False. The People’s Republic has never governed Taiwan for a single day in its 77 years. Premise two: The Batanes are an extension of Taiwan. Also false, and embarrassingly so. Two false premises marching toward a conclusion that would not survive a first-year logic seminar, delivered
RSS