Over the past two years, a series of serious industrial safety and pollution incidents have occurred in Chaoliao (潮寮) village, at the fifth and sixth naphtha cracker plants and at Formosa Plastics Group’s (台塑) Jenwu (仁武) plant. These issues have made people lose confidence in the government’s controls and highlighted the importance of self-help.
The Houchin (後勁) community is one of the areas that has been most affected by the petrochemical industry in Taiwan. It has been 27 years since Houchin residents fought against CPC Corp, Taiwan and its plans to establish a plant in Kaohsiung in 1987. This is one of the most determined communities in Taiwan in terms of fighting pollution. Apart from protests following industrial accidents, they have regularly organized their community to pay experts and academics to investigate air, water, soil and epidemiological issues to use as evidence in their petitioning. They have also monitored the city council to show how the CPC’s Kaohsiung plant is Taiwan’s worst polluting plant. Even so, industrial accidents continue to occur and it is hard to imagine how bad the pollution would be without local community monitoring.
Over the past few days, Yunlin County Commissioner Su Chih-fen (蘇治芬) has been negotiating compensation with Formosa Plastics in the aftermath of the recent explosion at its Mailiao plant. While demanding compensation from polluters is reasonable, cutting pollution is even more important. In the long-term interests of the nation and Yunlin County residents, I make the following suggestions:
The new Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology plant will be located on the north bank of the Jhuoshui River (濁水溪) opposite the sixth naphtha cracker plant. When development is completed, the combined pollution from these two plants will be even worse than current levels. The Ministry of Economic Affairs’ strategic environmental assessment report on the petrochemical industry should, of course, include information on all external costs caused by the petrochemical industry before being submitted to the Environmental Impact Assessment Committee for discussion. Before the environmental assessment is passed, the review of the plant should be suspended.
Second, since the fourth phase of the sixth naphtha cracker plant expansion is environmentally unsound, Formosa Plastics should stop development of the fifth expansion phase and pledge to decrease the emission of air pollutants each year to minimize health risks to residents. It should also promise complete recycling of waste water and zero emissions, and propose a carbon neutral solution based on 68 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions. The company should also release a list of all the toxins it produces, the volumes produced and their health risks, and release an annual environmental report to ensure that pollution is diminishing.
Third, in terms of damages, environmental restoration, industrial safety and pollution controls, I would suggest that the Yunlin County government and council, civic groups, experts and academics organize a group to carry out open and transparent negotiations with Formosa Plastics. There must be an end to closed-door negotiations with the company.
Yunlin residents must understand that stopping Formosa Plastics Group and making the government implement pollution controls will require strong action and a determined stance against pollution from civil society. County and community leaders should organize residents and invite experts, academics and environmental protection groups to form cooperative groups to establish a truly effective third party monitoring mechanism.
Lee Ken-cheng is director of Mercy on the Earth, Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS