The long-term survival of Taiwan depends on our ability to sustain the island environment in which we live. In determining a future path, it is important that politicians grasp the implications of this basic truth.
The recent controversy over Kuokuang Petrochemical Technology’s plan to build a naphtha cracker on the coast of Changhua County, and other environmental conflicts, show that the current government has a very poor understanding of what makes Taiwan special.
The location chosen for the Kuokuang plant is unsafe. The main reason for choosing that location was the cheapness of the land. Little if any consideration has been given to available water resources, coastline stability, the productivity of the surrounding sea or the capacity of nearby land and water sources to bear the burden of such a development.
Going ahead with the project would turn the area’s natural resources into wealth to be exploited for the benefit of a few capitalists at the cost of poisoning the soil, harming the health of local residents and destroying their way of life. This kind of development, robbing the poor to pay the rich, is unjust.
The island of Taiwan rose out of the sea 6 million years ago, formed from sediment eroded from the eastern part of the Eurasian continental plate, and it is still rising now. It came, you could say, out of nowhere, and is not part of any continent. Coastal wetlands act as carbon sinks, collecting and accumulating many carbon-containing substances, and they are extremely fertile.
Once the island of Taiwan was formed, plants and animals (such as the Chinese white dolphin) migrated here, as did humans. Among them, lowland peoples such as the Pingpu and Amis Aborigines lived mostly from the sea, while highlanders like the Bunun and Atayal Aborigines gathered their food from the mountainside. Taiwan, with its complex and endlessly changing geology, supports a great variety of life and its people found many ways to live off the land. For a long time, they managed to live in harmony with the environment.
Over the last four centuries, colonists from across the seas have come to Taiwan and opened the land up for unrestrained exploitation. As time went by they brought in industrial capital. Some Taiwanese made money alongside the newcomers, and a lifestyle that wastes natural resources became the norm.
People in Taiwan and around the world have become economic animals enslaved by material things, a mode of development that has led to the threat of global warming. Taiwan’s natural environment has been badly exploited and damaged, revealing the nightmarish nature of unsustainable development.
Industrial capitalism only started about 200 years ago — a very short period relative to the time humans have been on Earth. It is a new stage of experience and now that we can see its faults, we should change direction. People today have too long been estranged from nature and have gradually lost touch with its ways and its laws. Now our very survival is in question.
People need to be taught more about the environment to rebuild the vitality of Taiwan. We need to coax the ecosystem into providing us with the things we need to live in a sustainable way. Above all, we need to raise our civilization to a new level that respects life, and we need to debate the future of Taiwan. We cannot do it alone, only by working together with China and other countries.
When a government’s policies provoke popular resentment, it is just like a driver who has strayed from the route the passengers wish to take. It is time for the government to apologize and get back on the right path as soon as possible.
Chen Chang-po is a research fellow in the Biodiversity Center at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry