Ever since President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration came to power, it has stumbled around in the dark and achieved precious little. Its sluggish and apathetic response to Typhoon Morakot in August last year, was without doubt its worst hour, causing public outrage and costing it a premier. It also caused Ma’s popularity ratings to plummet to a low from which they have never really recovered. What is troubling is that a year on from the disaster, victims are still facing considerable challenges.
We have now arrived at the first anniversary of the carnage caused by Morakot, and the anger and frustration felt by Aborigines has reached critical mass. They have sent a succession of groups up to Taipei to stage protests against the government, and are even planning to take their case to the UN, accusing the government of contravening the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Indigenous Peoples Basic Act (原住民族基本法) by forcefully expropriating land. Furthermore, the inadequate post-disaster reconstruction efforts suggest that the government still has little idea about the enormity of the challenges faced by the local residents because it is orchestrating the destruction of Aborigines’ way of life.
This is the greatest tragedy of the whole affair.
It is true that many of the disaster areas have been listed as no-go zones unsuitable for human habitation and the original residents have been relocated to safer sites. In principle, this is the correct response. However, the total lack of participation by the residents raises concerns about the way the government has handled the safety surveys, the relocations and the reconstruction program.
The government has clearly failed to take the various tribes’ cultures and way of life into consideration. Aborigines have not had any input in the reconstruction committees at any level, and the recommendations they have come up with have been ignored. The lack of respect for their specific needs and poor communication has led to compulsory relocation and forced land expropriations. This is the main reason for the discontent.
The government’s reconstruction efforts have concentrated on the temporary relocation of disaster victims while permanent housing is built, with administrative efficiency, number crunching, moving people into permanent housing, repairing communication routes, boosting the local tourism industry and commissioning construction projects had been discredited as solutions even before the disaster happened. This illustrates a complete lack of comprehensive planning for the long-term needs of Aborigines.
What is happening is Aborigines are being asked to move away from the land they have lived on for centuries and that has sustained their economy, their culture and their survival for many generations, to safer areas. While this housing does give them a roof over their heads, it also isolates them from their way of life. This isolation will inevitably bring about changes that will see their economy wither and their cultural heritage fade away. The government, when making reconstruction preparations, overlooked these issues, failing to recognize that forcing these people from the homes and land they had lived on for many generations was not a simple matter of relocation, it was actually tearing up their cultural and economic roots.
The disaster victims have been let down by the government on several levels, mainly the speed of the reconstruction efforts, the quality of the housing and the arrangements of the places they have been relocated to. The relief efforts would have been better handled by civic groups.
The victims of Morakot can still legitimately ask the government the question: “Where are we to call home?” One wonders how the government would respond.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with