Substantially. That single word, left out of the IMF’s assessment of China’s undervalued currency, laid bare the tricky internal politics that govern even its most routine interactions with the world’s newest economic power.
IMF staff, under pressure for years from member countries to tell it like it is when assessing a country’s economic health, said China’s yuan was “substantially” undervalued.
However, by the time the final assessment passed through the IMF’s 24-member board of shareholder countries last Monday, that word had fallen victim to disagreements between those who put faith in Beijing to let its currency rise more rapidly and those among the G7 rich nations who doubt much progress would be made.
The board statement simply called the yuan “undervalued” with several countries questioning the accuracy of IMF staff projections of a major increase in China’s current account surplus over the next several years.
On the one side are emerging market economies, like Brazil, which stood behind China, and on the other the G7 old-line powers who believe the yuan is still too cheap but did not say so.
“The G7 wants more flexibility in how the currency is managed, but at the same time they want to do that diplomatically,” said Domenico Lombardi, a former IMF board member now at the Brookings Institution.
Still, Lombardi said calling the yuan undervalued, regardless of whether it is substantial or not, sent a strong signal to Beijing that it needs to revalue the currency.
reevaluation
“It is clear the board adopted a diplomatic stance. They tried to do their best not to upset the Chinese authorities but in the end preserved the substance of the IMF staff’s message by concurring the exchange rate was undervalued,” he added.
The outcome reflects not only muscle-flexing on the part of China but some softening of the US position.
US President Barack Obama’s administration has toned down some of the rhetoric former US president George W. Bush’s administration used when describing the extent to which China’s yuan is undervalued.
US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said repeatedly it is “China’s choice” to decide how and when to let market forces play a larger role in determining the yuan’s value, even as he emphasized it was in China’s interest to do so.
As recently as a week ago, he praised Beijing’s recent move to free the yuan from a dollar peg and described that as a helpful move toward easing global trade imbalances, even though the yuan has risen less than 1 percent since China did so.
“What matters to us is how fast and how far they let it go,” Geithner said, a gentle reminder that while Washington likes Beijing’s policy direction, it is also monitoring its effectiveness.
In contrast, the Bush administration grew frustrated with efforts to convince China to let its currency rise faster and pressured the IMF unsuccessfully to label China a currency manipulator.
While the IMF never bowed to that pressure, it did change its currency surveillance rules to say that member countries should stay away from policies that result in “external instability,” in addition to avoiding currency manipulation and intervention.
external instability
Beijing accused the IMF of not being even-handed and stalled the IMF’s process for reviewing its economy for two years. IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn has overturned that rule, saying it made discussions with member countries less open.
In another twist, China — supported by other emerging market economies — took umbrage with a footnote in the IMF staff report estimating that the yuan was undervalued by somewhere between 5 percent and 27 percent.
The footnote was removed at China’s behest before the staff documents were published on Thursday.
Such estimates are not unusual and fall well within the IMF’s area of expertise. They have, however, always been a thorny issue because of the broad disagreement among economists on how best to determine whether currencies accurately reflect a country’s economic fundamentals.
To be fair, all IMF member countries have a say in what is published and what is not in reviews of their economies.
“The Chinese looked at the whole report to assess whether it’s a fair and balanced report and also if we had reflected their views correctly in the report,” IMF mission chief to China Nigel Chalk told reporters on a conference call.
Eswar Prasad, a former IMF official and trade professor at Cornell University, said China’s surprisingly quick agreement to release the report reflected Beijing’s growing confidence it is in control of the global debate over its currency.
While the staff report had some tough language on the need for further currency reforms, it also praised Beijing’s recent announcement that it would move to a more flexible exchange rate, even though there has been little actual movement in the yuan.
China was further emboldened by the board’s at best lukewarm support for the IMF staff’s relatively hard-line position on the currency issue, Prasad said.
He said the staff report, which contains the authorities’ views, shows Beijing pushing back on all of the staff’s analysis and assertions used to support the finding of a substantially undervalued exchange rate.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China