If we look at the legislature’s past reviews of international treaties, the first thing that becomes apparent is that almost all bilateral treaties have been subject to a standardized legislative review process. In other words, they were submitted to the relevant legislative committee for clause-by-clause review, instead of proceeding directly to a second reading.
The 2003 free-trade agreement (FTA) between Taiwan and the Republic of Panama is similar in nature to the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) recently signed by Taiwan and China. As it happens, that particular FTA did proceed directly to a second reading. However, at the time there was broad public consensus that such an agreement should be signed with one of Taiwan’s longest diplomatic allies to further strengthen bilateral relations.
Furthermore, the legislature had little choice in the matter because the Taiwanese and Panamanian presidents had already signed the FTA before it was sent to the legislature, and they promised it would come into effect on Jan. 1, 2004. This arrangement did not give the legislature sufficient time to review the FTA properly.
In light of this situation, the legislature obediently approved the FTA, but passed a resolution declaring the signing process imperfect because of administrative flaws. This called on the government to respect constitutional procedures when signing agreements in future and also stated that when ministries or commissions under the Cabinet sign bilateral or multilateral treaties or agreements with a foreign counterpart, they should adhere to procedures laid down in Article 63 of the Constitution, which grants legislators the ultimate power to decide such cases by legislative vote. In the event of emergencies or where special conditions pertain, the resolution urged the government to obtain legislative authorization in advance.
When it comes to the ECFA, there is still no public consensus and no urgency. Despite this, those in power, still chose to manipulate legislative procedure, aided by the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) majority in that body. This begs the question how many problems remain hidden in the agreement because of the decision to avoid review by the relevant committee?
The ECFA is certain to have a dramatic impact on Taiwan, but whether that will be positive or negative remains to be seen and is the subject of much heated debate. Given the contentious nature of the deal, it should be reviewed on a clause-by-clause basis. Unfortunately, the legislature meekly ceded its right to monitor the ECFA. Such negligence on the part of the Ma administration is regrettable and a blow to democracy.
What is most worrying about this development is that after the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party decided the ECFA was a good agreement, the Taiwanese public were denied the opportunity to express their opinion on the deal. To add insult to injury, the KMT has put party loyalty before the interests of the nation by agreeing to rubber stamp the ECFA without a proper legislative review.
The legislature, which represents public opinion, has been unwilling or unable to monitor and review cross-strait affairs on behalf of the Taiwanese public. Therefore, holding a referendum in order to avoid an administrative dictatorship and legislative dereliction of duty is not only reasonable, but also the only option available.
Taiwan’s democracy is the product of years of struggle and sacrifice, it must not be sacrificed on the altar of political expediency for what are at best questionable gains.
Chiang Huang-chih is a professor in the Department of Law at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS