We’re so used to Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi that we barely raise an eyebrow.
What, a new Italian law to stop investigators bugging the prime minister and his mates? Because “their privacy” matters more than anything on the dark side of public life?
What, new draconian provisions to stop newspapers telling the full story until it’s all over in court — which it won’t be because “privacy” will stop it getting anywhere near court?
So Italy’s journalists rise in anger and despair.
Here’s the feeblest pillar of Europe’s freedom temple cracking yet again, but there’s a bigger problem still. Berlusconi is not alone.
Indeed, when you start looking around the EU, and then beyond its borders, all you find is temples tottering.
Twenty years ago, we fought to bring democratic freedoms to nations behind the iron curtain. Ten years ago, we fought to bring the rule of law to Iraq. Ten minutes ago, we were fighting and dying to do the same in Afghanistan, but it’s time to pause and draw breath.
In a few days, Hungary’s parliament will finally get to vote on a new Media Council — lumping radio, TV and telecoms together under a boss appointed by the government and a board appointed by the selfsame parliament (where what the government says goes).
Freedom House, the US research group that measures the quality of democracy around the world, has just issued its latest report on Nations in Transit, examining 29 states allegedly finding a better way after communism. Alas, many do not seem to be in transit to anywhere. They are stuck or sliding back — 14 did worse last year than the year before — and six of those failures lie within the EU’s borders. There’s Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovenia and (bottom of the class, because it seems a bit short of an independent judiciary) Slovakia.
At first, perhaps, it isn’t Europe that catches the eye. It’s the non-Baltic states that used to belong to the Soviet Union. Eight are, and seem doomed to remain, what Freedom House calls “consolidated authoritarian regimes,” or dictatorships. Twenty years after the Soviet Union disintegrated, 221 million people — 80 percent of the old population — enjoy no freedoms worth the name.
Russia itself has slipped back further over the last 10 years than any of its former satellites. More corruption year by year, so that “in many ways graft is the lifeblood of the current system.”
Due electoral process, civil society, independent media?
Wince a little and turn the page. The 90s, with their message of hope, are long gone. Nobody in the West makes speeches about the healing wonders of democracy any longer. Brits home from Kabul by 2015? Yes, if British Prime Minister David Cameron has his way, but don’t expect to find a functioning democracy left behind. That’s a yesterday dream, a Bush-Blair delusion. Today’s nightmare is just more Berlusconi.
Italy matters because it is big and relatively powerful. Hungary matters because it rose so memorably against its oppressors and the other EU five matter because they took and passed freedom’s tests before they joined the club.
Now we do nothing as they stall. The EU strove to bind Europe together in freedom, with common aspirations and goals. Democracy wasn’t an optional extra after Hitler and Mussolini, Franco and Salazar. It was what the new Europe was all about.
Today, Berlusconi weaves on regardless down his merry, rancid way. Bulgaria and Romania still struggle without help or encouragement. The Czechs and the Poles falter a little.
Yet nobody seems to care. It is as though we’ve given up on idealism, shrugged in the face of repression and crossed to the other side of the street.
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new