We’re so used to Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi that we barely raise an eyebrow.
What, a new Italian law to stop investigators bugging the prime minister and his mates? Because “their privacy” matters more than anything on the dark side of public life?
What, new draconian provisions to stop newspapers telling the full story until it’s all over in court — which it won’t be because “privacy” will stop it getting anywhere near court?
So Italy’s journalists rise in anger and despair.
Here’s the feeblest pillar of Europe’s freedom temple cracking yet again, but there’s a bigger problem still. Berlusconi is not alone.
Indeed, when you start looking around the EU, and then beyond its borders, all you find is temples tottering.
Twenty years ago, we fought to bring democratic freedoms to nations behind the iron curtain. Ten years ago, we fought to bring the rule of law to Iraq. Ten minutes ago, we were fighting and dying to do the same in Afghanistan, but it’s time to pause and draw breath.
In a few days, Hungary’s parliament will finally get to vote on a new Media Council — lumping radio, TV and telecoms together under a boss appointed by the government and a board appointed by the selfsame parliament (where what the government says goes).
Freedom House, the US research group that measures the quality of democracy around the world, has just issued its latest report on Nations in Transit, examining 29 states allegedly finding a better way after communism. Alas, many do not seem to be in transit to anywhere. They are stuck or sliding back — 14 did worse last year than the year before — and six of those failures lie within the EU’s borders. There’s Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovenia and (bottom of the class, because it seems a bit short of an independent judiciary) Slovakia.
At first, perhaps, it isn’t Europe that catches the eye. It’s the non-Baltic states that used to belong to the Soviet Union. Eight are, and seem doomed to remain, what Freedom House calls “consolidated authoritarian regimes,” or dictatorships. Twenty years after the Soviet Union disintegrated, 221 million people — 80 percent of the old population — enjoy no freedoms worth the name.
Russia itself has slipped back further over the last 10 years than any of its former satellites. More corruption year by year, so that “in many ways graft is the lifeblood of the current system.”
Due electoral process, civil society, independent media?
Wince a little and turn the page. The 90s, with their message of hope, are long gone. Nobody in the West makes speeches about the healing wonders of democracy any longer. Brits home from Kabul by 2015? Yes, if British Prime Minister David Cameron has his way, but don’t expect to find a functioning democracy left behind. That’s a yesterday dream, a Bush-Blair delusion. Today’s nightmare is just more Berlusconi.
Italy matters because it is big and relatively powerful. Hungary matters because it rose so memorably against its oppressors and the other EU five matter because they took and passed freedom’s tests before they joined the club.
Now we do nothing as they stall. The EU strove to bind Europe together in freedom, with common aspirations and goals. Democracy wasn’t an optional extra after Hitler and Mussolini, Franco and Salazar. It was what the new Europe was all about.
Today, Berlusconi weaves on regardless down his merry, rancid way. Bulgaria and Romania still struggle without help or encouragement. The Czechs and the Poles falter a little.
Yet nobody seems to care. It is as though we’ve given up on idealism, shrugged in the face of repression and crossed to the other side of the street.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
On Wednesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) drew parallels between the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) under President William Lai (賴清德) now and the fascism of Germany under Adolf Hitler. The German Institute Taipei, Berlin’s de facto embassy in Taiwan, expressed on social media its “deep disappointment and concern” over the comments. “We must state unequivocally: Taiwan today is in no way comparable to the tyranny of National Socialism,” it said, referring to the Nazi Party. “We are disappointed and concerned to learn about the inappropriate comparison between the atrocities of the Nazi regime and the current political context