Whether patents and technology should be transferred from colleges, universities and other academic institutions and whether professors should be allowed to establish companies has been the subject of much heated debate recently. The issue of recusal has also caused many experts and academics to demand sunshine legislation.
In addition to teaching, academic research and counseling, university professors should also assist with industrial innovation and help improve competitiveness. National development would benefit greatly if professors and their postgraduate students were better able to transform knowledge into economic power by creating new types of output value.
Product prototypes are created through theoretical derivation, the creation of algorithms and product tests. However, the technology gap between a prototype and a market-ready product is often hard to bridge.
Inadequate funding and oranization mean that many colleges and universities are unable to overcome such obstacles. This means much research only appears in special publications. Such technology cannot be applied to products through technology transfers or business, which means its benefits are limited.
In the US, Japan and the EU, it is quite common for full-time university professors to set up companies. In these countries, professors well-versed in the latest technologies lead students in the real life application of algorithms and in product R&D. This means that such countries have more chances to benefit economically. It is also beneficial in securing patents and technology transfers.
Data from the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Intellectual Property Office shows that in 2008, the US and Japan obtained 185,224 and 215,249 patents respectively, while Taiwan only obtained 42,283.
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) is an interesting case study. In February, the US business research institution, the Kauffmann Foundation, released a report entitled “Entrepreneurial Impact: The role of MIT.” This said that if all companies founded by teachers, students and graduates of MIT were put together and counted as a nation, it would be the 17th biggest economy in the world. The report also said MIT teachers, students and graduates have founded a total of 25,800 companies with about 3.3 million employees, and average annual sales of US$2 trillion.
Some worry that universities will lose their autonomy if they get too close to business and that professors will confuse their roles and encounter conflicts of interest. However, if suitable measures are put in place, if schools become partners in companies and if patents and technology transfer licensing fees were established, professors with specialized knowledge and business acumen could turn their knowledge into output value, which would be a good thing.
Such a business model could encourage people to take out more patents of a higher quality, ensuring Taiwan exports more technology products than it imports.
We lack outlets for creativity, and the results of our patents and technology transfers are limited. These problems have been discussed for some time, and the attitude of the Ministry of Education and the National Science Council, the institutions in charge of guiding public and private universities, is now crucial.
In this age of knowledge-based economies, there are only three choices: To be creative and innovative, to blindly follow others or be eliminated due to a lack of competitiveness. Taiwan is full of creative people. Which one of these three choices are we going to make?
Luo Ren-chuan is a professor of electrical engineering at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry