Today’s rally in protest against a “one China” market and calling for a referendum on the soon to be signed cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) appears likely to attract large crowds. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his ministers, for their part, have not sat idly by in the face of mounting public opposition to an ECFA. Government departments have been spending taxpayers’ money to trumpet the supposed benefits of the agreement, while at the same time speeding up negotiations with China to get the pact signed as soon as possible.
On Tuesday, Japanese business strategist Kenichi Ohmae was invited by the Office of the President to give a lecture. Ohmae used the occasion to extol the virtues of an ECFA, describing it as a finely concocted dose of vitamins that would revive Taiwan’s economy and keep it on the track to success.
Attending the talk, Ma lauded Ohmae as a master of future trends, but many things the supposed guru said raise questions about his understanding of Taiwan and China. For instance, he said that Asia as a whole is becoming more and more dependent on China, but that Taiwan, with its distinct advantages, has avoided becoming excessively reliant on its giant neighbor. He should be aware that China’s “united front” strategy is to use economic means to draw Taiwan more closely into its orbit. Once Taiwan has become completely dependent, it will be firmly in China’s grasp.
Prominent Chinese economist and government adviser Hu Angang (胡鞍鋼) once said that Taiwan needs trade with China like a diabetic needs insulin and questioned whether Taiwan could survive without regular doses. He added that if China were to start a trade war with Taiwan, it would be over within seven days. Ohmae would do well to learn a bit more about China’s strategy to force unification on Taiwan by economic means.
He went on to say that the Taiwan must forge ahead with signing the ECFA. Once an ECFA is signed, he said, it will evolve into a free-trade agreement (FTA), allowing Taiwan to compete on a level playing field.
It appears that Ohmae failed to do his homework before seeking to enlighten Ma and his government officials. If he had done so, surely he would know why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Communist-led governments are signing an ECFA, which is not a country-to-country agreement, instead of an FTA, which is a pact between two countries.
Moreover, Chinese officials have already made it very clear that once the ECFA is signed, Taiwan will have to obtain China’s approval before signing an FTA with any other country. Yet Ohmae seemed to be completely unaware of this. His seminar was clearly intended to cast the ECFA in the best possible light, without mentioning any drawbacks. Only bureaucrats serving in Ma’s government, shrouded as they are in self-deception, could stand to hear such a one-sided sermon.
We suggest that Ohmae take advantage of his visit to Taiwan to do some on-the-ground research. China paints a marvelous picture of an ECFA’s benefits and Ohmae himself describes the proposed agreement as packed with vitamins needed for Taiwan’s continued good health. He should ask himself why, despite all the propaganda, most Taiwanese people still harbor doubts. Why do they still worry that Taiwan’s economy will become locked into the Chinese market, that job opportunities will dry up and real wages fall and that Taiwan’s sovereignty will be threatened?
This weekend’s protest march opposing a “one China” market and calling for an ECFA referendum can be seen as an expression of these worries. Opposing a “one China” market means rejecting both dependence on a single Chinese market and the so-called “one-China principle.”
If Taiwan’s economy is locked into a single Chinese market, its industries and jobs will be hollowed out even more than they are already and the national economy and people’s livelihood will suffer. If Taiwan’s sovereignty is locked into a single China, Taiwanese will lose the right to determine their own future. In the end, they will be like lambs to the slaughter. That is why so many people insist on exercising their constitutional right to a referendum.
Ohmae hails from a sovereign, independent nation, so surely he wouldn’t suggest that the Taiwanese should just bow down and accept this fate.
When he ran for president, Ma said that Taiwan’s future should be decided by the 23 million Taiwanese, without any interference from the Chinese communists. Now, however, he has gone back on those words. Ma’s administration has evaded public and legislative oversight by negotiating with China in secret. By so doing, it will bind Taiwan to China, first economically and then politically.
What Taiwan gets in the process is neither favors from China nor Ohmae’s so-called “vitamins.” A more likely outcome is Hu’s “diabetes.” Anyone with the slightest medical knowledge knows that if Taiwan had diabetes, then it would depend on China’s insulin to keep it alive. In that kind of relationship, if Taiwan happened to offend China in any way, China could cut off the insulin supply and Taiwan would perish. Once Taiwan’s sickness became incurable, China could negate its sovereignty with ease.
The Taiwanese public have long since wised up to Ma’s desire for eventual unification. It seems they are smarter than Ohmae, who, despite his reputation as a master of future trends, seems to have little idea about where an ECFA with communist China is likely to lead.
TRANSLATED BY TAIJING WU AND JULIAN CLEGG
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS