Today’s rally in protest against a “one China” market and calling for a referendum on the soon to be signed cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) appears likely to attract large crowds. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his ministers, for their part, have not sat idly by in the face of mounting public opposition to an ECFA. Government departments have been spending taxpayers’ money to trumpet the supposed benefits of the agreement, while at the same time speeding up negotiations with China to get the pact signed as soon as possible.
On Tuesday, Japanese business strategist Kenichi Ohmae was invited by the Office of the President to give a lecture. Ohmae used the occasion to extol the virtues of an ECFA, describing it as a finely concocted dose of vitamins that would revive Taiwan’s economy and keep it on the track to success.
Attending the talk, Ma lauded Ohmae as a master of future trends, but many things the supposed guru said raise questions about his understanding of Taiwan and China. For instance, he said that Asia as a whole is becoming more and more dependent on China, but that Taiwan, with its distinct advantages, has avoided becoming excessively reliant on its giant neighbor. He should be aware that China’s “united front” strategy is to use economic means to draw Taiwan more closely into its orbit. Once Taiwan has become completely dependent, it will be firmly in China’s grasp.
Prominent Chinese economist and government adviser Hu Angang (胡鞍鋼) once said that Taiwan needs trade with China like a diabetic needs insulin and questioned whether Taiwan could survive without regular doses. He added that if China were to start a trade war with Taiwan, it would be over within seven days. Ohmae would do well to learn a bit more about China’s strategy to force unification on Taiwan by economic means.
He went on to say that the Taiwan must forge ahead with signing the ECFA. Once an ECFA is signed, he said, it will evolve into a free-trade agreement (FTA), allowing Taiwan to compete on a level playing field.
It appears that Ohmae failed to do his homework before seeking to enlighten Ma and his government officials. If he had done so, surely he would know why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Communist-led governments are signing an ECFA, which is not a country-to-country agreement, instead of an FTA, which is a pact between two countries.
Moreover, Chinese officials have already made it very clear that once the ECFA is signed, Taiwan will have to obtain China’s approval before signing an FTA with any other country. Yet Ohmae seemed to be completely unaware of this. His seminar was clearly intended to cast the ECFA in the best possible light, without mentioning any drawbacks. Only bureaucrats serving in Ma’s government, shrouded as they are in self-deception, could stand to hear such a one-sided sermon.
We suggest that Ohmae take advantage of his visit to Taiwan to do some on-the-ground research. China paints a marvelous picture of an ECFA’s benefits and Ohmae himself describes the proposed agreement as packed with vitamins needed for Taiwan’s continued good health. He should ask himself why, despite all the propaganda, most Taiwanese people still harbor doubts. Why do they still worry that Taiwan’s economy will become locked into the Chinese market, that job opportunities will dry up and real wages fall and that Taiwan’s sovereignty will be threatened?
This weekend’s protest march opposing a “one China” market and calling for an ECFA referendum can be seen as an expression of these worries. Opposing a “one China” market means rejecting both dependence on a single Chinese market and the so-called “one-China principle.”
If Taiwan’s economy is locked into a single Chinese market, its industries and jobs will be hollowed out even more than they are already and the national economy and people’s livelihood will suffer. If Taiwan’s sovereignty is locked into a single China, Taiwanese will lose the right to determine their own future. In the end, they will be like lambs to the slaughter. That is why so many people insist on exercising their constitutional right to a referendum.
Ohmae hails from a sovereign, independent nation, so surely he wouldn’t suggest that the Taiwanese should just bow down and accept this fate.
When he ran for president, Ma said that Taiwan’s future should be decided by the 23 million Taiwanese, without any interference from the Chinese communists. Now, however, he has gone back on those words. Ma’s administration has evaded public and legislative oversight by negotiating with China in secret. By so doing, it will bind Taiwan to China, first economically and then politically.
What Taiwan gets in the process is neither favors from China nor Ohmae’s so-called “vitamins.” A more likely outcome is Hu’s “diabetes.” Anyone with the slightest medical knowledge knows that if Taiwan had diabetes, then it would depend on China’s insulin to keep it alive. In that kind of relationship, if Taiwan happened to offend China in any way, China could cut off the insulin supply and Taiwan would perish. Once Taiwan’s sickness became incurable, China could negate its sovereignty with ease.
The Taiwanese public have long since wised up to Ma’s desire for eventual unification. It seems they are smarter than Ohmae, who, despite his reputation as a master of future trends, seems to have little idea about where an ECFA with communist China is likely to lead.
TRANSLATED BY TAIJING WU AND JULIAN CLEGG
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS