Democracy degenerated
The answer to your editorial question (“Where is the fruit of our democracy?” June 16, page 8) is that the fruit of Taiwan’s democracy is being eaten up by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration. They like to eat fruit but do not follow the Taiwanese maxim “to worship the roots of trees when eating the fruit.” Instead they are trying to cut down the tree.
It is undemocratic for Ma’s administration to reject a proposed referendum on whether Taiwan should sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China.
It is also authoritarian for Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) to issue a directive to amend the Referendum Act so that the government can do as it wishes.
The recent on-site police surveillance of a survey on the ECFA in Chaojhou Township (潮州), Pingtung County was reminiscent of the White Terror period under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國).
If Ma is proud of democracy in Taiwan, how can he let this police surveillance happen?
In the mid-1990s, Ma was strongly opposed to Taiwanese voters directly electing their president; now he owes his presidency to this democratic process. Ma has been in office for more than two years — what has he accomplished in terms of democratization? How does his performance compare to his campaign pledges and promises?
Recently, Ma has vowed to “create a golden decade” in Taiwan and proposed six measures to “strengthen the country.” Judging from his performance to date, how much trust should Taiwanese have in his new proposal? The “gold” might turn out to be fool’s gold.
The “country” might become an entirely different country.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
‘Taiwan, Province of China’
From time to time, news stories and editorials surface in this paper decrying, and rightfully so, the way some international Web sites treat Taiwan. Many times, when people in Taiwan want to register to become participants in a Web site forum, they are asked where they live, and often the only choice on the flipdown list is: “Taiwan, Province of China.”
This happens on Web sites all over the world, from the US to France, from Germany to Japan. These kinds of problems crop up online (and in the news) every week or so, and I am sure there will be another news story about this before long.
However, it is important to note that the problem is not with the offending Web sites themselves but with the software they use for their registration forms. They download various country lists from Web sites that sell them, and most of these country-registration sites use an international list — incorrect, of course — that has only one listing for Taiwan, and that is “Taiwan, Province of China.”
This happened to me just the other day. I was registering at the Manchester Evening News Web site in the UK and when asked to state where I was living, the only choice I was given for Taiwan was “Taiwan, Province of China.” Of course, I wrote to the newspaper’s editors and told them there was a mistake in their registration form. And of course, they wrote back and said sorry. But it’s not the newspaper’s fault. The fault lies in the companies that sell these faulty country name lists.
And it will happen again and again. Until hell freezes over.
DAN BLOOM
Chiayi City
Taiwan’s ‘airport night market’
The management of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport has been lambasted by KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾), who says that the premier gateway into our country has turned into a “night market” (“Lo pans airport ‘night market,’” June 19, page 1). There are many different reasons why this unbelievable and absurd situation has continued for so long.
For instance, the food sold by these illegal vendors is cheaper than that sold by the licensed restaurants.
In addition, these illegal vendors also provide vegetarian dishes to vegetarian employees at the airport.
However, even though there are plenty of uncontrollable factors behind the illegal vending, the airport administration is responsible for dealing with these embarrassing circumstances. This is even more important since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has just announced an economic development policy under which the airport will be revamped into a modern, competitive international transportation hub. This involves renovating the old buildings, developing a modern shopping mall, providing a competitive business center, resourceful food courts and so forth.
In fact, the airport is the face of a country. Foreign tourists receive their first impression of a country at the airport. If our government cannot enforce its jurisdiction over illegal vendors in the international airport, how can the government convince the Taiwanese people and foreign visitors that Taiwan’s premier airport will be transformed into a first-class gateway to the Asia-Pacific any time soon?
CLAIRE WU
Taipei County
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS