It was this month 15 years ago that then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) visited his alma mater, Cornell University. In retrospect, the visit turned out to be a key development in US-Taiwan relations. It would be good to pause for a moment and reflect on the importance of that historic visit.
Lee had studied agricultural economics at Iowa State University in the 1950s, and — after an academic career and work with the Joint Commission on Rural Reconstruction — returned to the US and received his PhD at Cornell in 1968. During this time, he was deeply influenced by developments in the US, observing the functioning of democracy up close.
After returning to Taiwan, he began to rise through the ranks, becoming Taipei mayor in 1978 and governor of Taiwan Province three years later. A skilled technocrat, he came to the attention of then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), who eventually made him vice president.
When Chiang passed away in early 1988, Lee was thrust into the limelight, becoming the first Taiwan-born president. In that position, he made the final push toward Taiwan’s momentous transition to democracy, ending the Temporary Provisions Effective During the Period of Communist Rebellion (動員戡亂時期臨時條款) in 1991, moving toward full elections for all seats in the Legislative Yuan in 1992 and bringing about Taiwan’s first-ever direct elections for president in 1996.
However, internal democracy in Taiwan was only his first objective. He also wanted to bring about an end to Taiwan’s international isolation, which was caused by the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) decades-long insistence that they were the rightful rulers of all of China. A small step in that direction would be a visit to his alma mater, Cornell University. Once he could visit his university, other doors would be opened, or so his thinking went.
From 1992 on, he and his government worked hard — both openly and behind the scenes — to bring a visit to fruition. Initially, this was nixed time and again by the old crowd in the US State Department, who wanted to preserve the legacy of Washington’s 1971 opening to China and had little feel for the democratic and international aspirations of Taiwan and its president.
However, in May 1995, then-US president Bill Clinton had to succumb to pressure from US Congress, which was much more in tune with Taiwan and its democracy. The resulting visit was in a sense rather uneventful — Lee gave a subdued speech, merely extolling Taiwan’s democratic achievements.
However, the leaders in Beijing saw it differently: They perceived Lee’s visit as a challenge to their goals of reining in and eventually absorbing Taiwan. They began the first missile crisis in the summer of 1995; to be followed in March 1996 by more missile firings designed to intimidate Taiwan’s electorate ahead of its first presidential elections. The Clinton administration responded to the provocations by deploying two aircraft carrier battle groups.
In spite of the threats, Lee was elected Taiwan’s first directly elected president, serving until 2000, when he was succeeded by the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Lee can thus be credited for completing the transition to democracy, started by the democratic opposition in the 1980s, and for laying the foundation for the peaceful transition of rule from the KMT to DPP in 2000.
While many international observers lauded the second change of political power in 2008 as evidence that Taiwan has become a democracy, we need to remember that Taiwan’s fledgling democracy is still young and relatively frail. Constant vigilance is warranted and we need to voice concern when basic human rights, justice and values of freedom and democracy are placed on a sliding slope.
China is continuing to threaten Taiwan’s existence as a free and democratic nation. Using the carrot of an economic cooperation framework agreement and the stick of its military might, Beijing will continue to try to influence political decision-making in Taiwan in its favor.
At this critical juncture, we need to remember the long road to democracy traveled and protect the legacy left by Taiwan’s democratic opposition and by a statesman such as Lee.
Nat Bellocchi is a former chairman of the American Institute in Taiwan and a special adviser to the Liberty Times Group. The views expressed in this article are his own.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry