President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration has proven itself adept at saying one thing, while doing another. Examples include hiking commodity prices while claiming to “take the people’s plight to heart” and refusing to hold a referendum while saying that doing so on important issues “pertains to the public interest.”
When meeting with a delegation led by Columbia University’s vice president of Arts and Sciences Nicholas Dirks on Monday, Ma said that although some say that Asian, and particularly Chinese, cultures are not suited for democracy, Taiwan’s “democratic seed has taken root” through decades of continuous practice and implementation. Noting a congratulatory telegraph sent two years ago by then-US president George W. Bush commending the success of Taiwan’s presidential election and lauding Taiwan as “a beacon of democracy for Asia and the world,” Ma went on to tell his US guests of his desire to further Taiwan’s democracy, as it is a path “worth continuing on.”
Taiwan prides itself on its democratization experience and it is befitting for the president to trumpet this achievement for all the world.
However, allowing democracy to take root is one thing; consolidating the fruits of democracy is another. Recent incidents have led some to wonder how Ma’s talk of furthering Taiwan’s democracy measures up.
Case in point: Minister of the Interior Jiang Yi-hua (江宜樺) on Monday confirmed that Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) has issued a directive requesting his ministry to look into drawing up a proposal within three months on whether there is a need to amend the Referendum Act (公民投票法).
The move came in the wake of the Referendum Review Committee’s rejection of an opposition-proposed referendum on the government’s planned cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), with Wu quoted by local media as saying that the amendment is being mulled “in a bid to avoid similar cases in the future in which a referendum proposal is initiated to affect or obstruct the government from doing what it should be doing.”
A second example saw police officers dispatched to the 37 stations set up by Pingtung County’s Chaojhou Township (潮州) on Saturday to monitor a township-wide survey, coinciding with borough and village-level elections, that asked two questions: “Do you agree with Taiwan signing an economic cooperation framework agreement with China?” and “Do you agree that a tap water system should be installed throughout Chaojhou?”
Among the 4,932 valid responses received, 4,394 were against signing an ECFA, while 538 said they supported the trade pact. Township officials said that more people would have taken part in the survey if it wasn’t for the intimidation of the on-site police surveillance, in addition to the fact the survey administrators were asked by the Central Election Commission — to avoid inciting disturbance and obstructing local elections — to keep survey stations 30m away from the election ballot stations.
As it is within a local governing body’s rights to hold surveys to help it better understand its people’s views and needs, what was it about this survey that required police surveillance? If mention of the ECFA issue was the main reason for police surveillance, it shows how intent the central government is on repressing people’s right to express their views.
Against the backdrop of the Ma administration’s opposition to holding a referendum on an ECFA, the public has good reason to worry whether the premier intends to amend the Referendum Act to further restrict people’s voices. If the end goal of all these actions is to give the government more control over the people and to stop people from making their opinions heard, how can Ma tout Taiwan as a beacon of democracy for other countries?
The Ma administration has proven it can talk the talk of democracy. Can it walk the walk?
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US