The looting of art and cultural treasures over the centuries, by explorers, archeologists, soldiers and thieves, has become something of a cause celebre in museums around the world in recent decades.
Think of the outcry over the Elgin marbles in London, the Pergamon gates and Nefertiti’s bust in Berlin. Anyone who visits Angkor Wat should think about all those hacked-off friezes and Buddha heads.
The National Palace Museum is currently promoting a special exhibition of Tibetan Buddhist treasures that opens on July 1. The museum boasts that the show will include 130 artifacts from China, dating from the 5th to the 20th century, including many “lent” by the Potala and Norbulingka palaces in Lhasa and important Tibetan monasteries such as Sakya, Palcho and Tashilhunpo.
A senior museum official said the exhibit will “display the superiority of Tibetan art.” The museum Web site says: “No doubt Buddhism has become the flesh and blood of Tibetan culture,” adding that it hopes the exhibition will “bring about a better understanding of Tibetan history and culture.”
Left unsaid in the promotional materials is that most of the buildings at Sakya were razed during China’s Cultural Revolution, while Palcho was partially destroyed during the 1959 uprising against Chinese rule. Tashilhunpo lost two-thirds of its buildings at the hands of the Red Guards, although as the seat of the Panchen Lama it fared better than most.
Will there be any mention of the other monasteries that were demolished — like the great university at Ganden — the hundreds of thousands of scriptures that were burned, the monks and nuns that were killed, imprisoned or forced out of their orders — or of the repression of religion that continues in Tibet and Tibetan areas today?
The Beijing government and Chinese nationalists complain loudly about the looting and burning of the Summer Palace by British and French troops in October 1860 and the subsequent dispersal of its treasures around the world. An attempt to auction two bronze animal heads from the palace early last year was thwarted by “patriotic” Cai Mingchao (蔡銘超), who made the winning bid and then announced he had no intention of paying because they should be returned to China for free. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu (姜瑜) earlier made the usual noises about how “auctioning cultural objects looted in war time … offends the Chinese people and undermines their cultural rights.”
The silence from Beijing, however, is deafening when it comes to the destruction of cultural treasures and family heirlooms during the Chinese Communist Party’s march to power and the Cultural Revolution.
Promoting a show of Buddhist treasures from Tibetan monestaries is not like exhibiting the jade burial suit of Prince Liu Sheng (劉勝) unearthed in Sichuan or a terracotta warrior or two from Xian or the Beauty of Loulan from Xinjiang.
Beijing’s systematic efforts to crush the culture and religion of Tibet cannot and should not be ignored. The “Sacred Land Tibet — Treasures from the Roof of the World” show should not be seen as a celebration of an ancient culture and religion. It is a display of trophies from a government that has tried to eradicate the culture it purports to be presenting. It is akin to an exhibition of Torah, menorah and other items from sacked synagogues and Jewish homes organized by the Third Reich.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS