The Huangguoshu Waterfall in China’s southwestern Guizhou Province is a magnificent sight, when there is water. The largest waterfall in Asia, it plunges over a sheer cliff more than 60m high in a thundering display of foam, mist and rainbows.
Unfortunately, this wonder of nature has recently suffered an indignity. Every evening, it gets turned off as if it were a garden fountain. This part of China’s southwest, known for its abundant rainfall, mountains, underground rivers and caves and tropical flora, has recently been gripped by a drought that many say is the worst since the Ming Dynasty.
Therefore, when all the tourists that irrigate this poor region with precious income have left the viewing platforms below the falls, authorities close the sluice gates that dam the White Water River on the dangerously low upstream reservoir, and the falls cease. Then, each morning, before the tourists reappear, they unceremoniously open the gates again, so that the eerily silent falls suddenly revive in a simulacrum of normalcy.
The disturbance to so elemental a part of this region’s natural architecture is a measure of only one of the many kinds of severe weather aberrations — from floods and droughts to unseasonal blizzards and massive dust storms — that have been unsettling China of late. No one can say with any certainty what the causes are.
To try to compensate for these perturbed weather patterns, Chinese officialdom has launched an unprecedented array of costly projects. These include the titanic US$55 billion South-North Water Transfer Project, a massive engineering effort to construct three canals to bring water from China’s normally wet south to its arid north; a widespread campaign to dig ever-deeper wells; a nationwide tree-planting campaign; and even an extensive effort at “weather modification.”
According to China Meteorological Administration director Zheng Guoguang (鄭國光), “Science and technology will answer the prayers of those living through the harshest drought in decades.”
He says that two-thirds of China’s almost 3,000 counties have tried artificial methods to induce more rainfall, sometimes resulting in lawsuits over rights to mine passing clouds for water. Such efforts, Zheng reports, have involved 6,533 cannons, 5,939 rocket launchers and numerous aircraft in an attempt to seed clouds across one-third of China’s landmass with dry ice, ammonia and silver iodide.
But can science and technology really solve problems that are not caused by China alone? More and more, scientists are beginning to suspect that global warming has caused the radically changed patterns of precipitation now seen across China. If true, China will never resolve droughts such as the current one in Guizhou by itself, regardless of how many large-scale engineering projects the government undertakes, or how well organized remedial efforts are. After all, global problems demand global solutions.
When Mao Zedong (毛澤東) still reigned supreme, one of his most vaunted principles was zili gengsheng, or “self-reliance.” Since China had been bullied, invaded, semi-colonized and even occupied during most of his formative years, he was deeply suspicious that any foreign country — even a “fraternal” Communist ally — could ever be relied upon to leave China alone, much less actually help it. As a result, the Chinese Communist Party leadership became steeped in suspicion and distrust toward the outside world, especially toward the so-called “great powers.”
Even today, with Mao’s revolution long gone and globalization having knit a new fabric of interdependence around China, there remains, particularly among older leaders, a residual wariness about relying on collaboration with outsiders, especially when it comes to “core interests.”
However, it is not just world markets that have enmeshed China in a new commons. Issues such as nuclear proliferation and the global environment — and especially climate change — have also snuck up on China’s leaders (and everyone else). Like it or not, leaders everywhere are now enfolded in an inescapable web.
Thus, despite China’s predilection for aloofness, cooperation is not merely an option but a necessity. And that means China also must reconsider its rigid notion of sovereignty. This is a difficult adjustment for any country to make, especially one like China which has a history of imagining itself as being at the center of the world while also remaining an inviolable entity that can close its doors whenever it chooses to do so. That time is past.
China’s leaders have been committed to a process of “opening” for more than a generation, but they remain neuralgic about any hint of outside interference, including even the suggestion that their nation’s business might also be the business of other peoples, and vice versa. The drought in Guizhou, whatever its cause, is a reminder that the fate of China’s people has become inextricably linked to what happens elsewhere, and that no country can opt out or find unilateral solutions separate from the global commonwealth any longer.
Orville Schell is director of the Center on US-China Relations at the Asia Society.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS