Eman AbdelRahman is one of 200,000 people who have signed up on Facebook to back Mohamed ElBaradei, the former UN nuclear boss, who has said he wants to shatter 30 years of political stasis in Egypt by running for president.
Despite a surge in online support for political alternatives to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, 82, who has been in power since 1981, even ardent supporters acknowledge that online activism in Egypt cannot deliver change without action on the streets.
“We need collaboration from everyone in Egypt, including those who are online and those who are not -- students, workers, housewives,” said AbdelRahman, a 25-year-old engineer.
The speed with which supporters signed up to Facebook after ElBaradei returned to Egypt in February, adding tens of thousands in a few days, reflects pent-up frustration before parliament and presidential elections this year and next, analysts say.
However, they say the challenge is galvanizing the masses in a country where opposition parties are weak, where police crush even modest protests and where the banned Muslim Brotherhood, the biggest opposition group, has shunned action on the streets.
“It’s unrealistic to think that online activism can turn things around without the existence of an opposition that can challenge the state,” political analyst Amr Hamzawy said. “There is a clear lack of constituency building on the ground.”
Iran is cited as an example of how social networking tools can help rally hundreds of thousands. In the Islamic Republic, Twitter and other sites were used to draw protesters out against last year’s presidential election, which they said was rigged.
However, opposition voices in Iran, even within the confines set by the Islamic Republic’s political system, are a more potent force than in Egypt where opposition parties are fragmented and have limited popular following.
“What bloggers did was expose the power of Iran’s opposition ... Egypt does not have this grassroots audience,” said Rabab el Mahdi, a professor at the American University of Cairo.
The Muslim Brotherhood, banned under a law against any political group being based on religion, is the only group in Egypt with a network across the nation that could, analysts say, bring tens of thousands onto the streets if it chose.
However, the Brotherhood is wary of a confrontation that could bring a crushing security response, threatening the group’s existence, analysts say. It has shunned street protests to focus on its medical and other social programs to build support.
Even modest protests in Egypt draw an overwhelming, and often violent, police response. However, heavy-handed security has also been part of the reason activists have taken to the Web.
“At one point the dynamism died down and activists found it difficult to mobilize in large numbers ... so they shifted to online gatherings,” blogger Hossam Hamalawy said.
Facebook became a platform for rallying dissidents in 2008, after the April Sixth Youth movement drew more than 70,000 supporters to its page to back a strike over surging food prices. Protests on April 6 of that year had led to clashes with police.
This year, on the anniversary of the 2008 protests, demonstrators turned out in Cairo chanting “Down, down, Hosni Mubarak.” Just a few hundred turned up, small by global standards, but a rarity in Egypt. Heavily outnumbered by police, many protesters were beaten before the demonstration ended.
It has been a similar story at follow-up protests.
Creating momentum may be a challenge for online activists in Egypt, a country of 78 million where the UN puts illiteracy at 34 percent and Internet penetration at 17 percent.
Iran, with a comparable population, has illiteracy of 18 percent and Internet usage of 31 percent.
Yet Egypt’s government is still wary of the Web community.
The Internet is not policed as in Iran or some other Arab states where sites, including Facebook, are blocked, but bloggers and Web activists have been detained. Rights groups say Egypt has used a long-standing emergency law to do so.
This month Cairo extended the law, already in place for almost three decades, for two more years, but said it would limit usage to terror and narcotics cases. Rights groups are skeptical.
Aware of the limits of the Web, some online ElBaradei supporters have gone offline by gathering signatures for a petition demanding constitutional changes and more freedom.
Yusuf AbdelRahman, representing ElBaradei’s Facebook group, said the petition had 54,870 online signatures so far, but added that 15,000 Facebook members have volunteered to go on the streets of Cairo and other cities to collect more signatures.
“[This] is a crucial step considering that three decades of state repression has left many afraid of taking action. Others accept repressive measures as a fact of life,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US