Eman AbdelRahman is one of 200,000 people who have signed up on Facebook to back Mohamed ElBaradei, the former UN nuclear boss, who has said he wants to shatter 30 years of political stasis in Egypt by running for president.
Despite a surge in online support for political alternatives to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, 82, who has been in power since 1981, even ardent supporters acknowledge that online activism in Egypt cannot deliver change without action on the streets.
“We need collaboration from everyone in Egypt, including those who are online and those who are not -- students, workers, housewives,” said AbdelRahman, a 25-year-old engineer.
The speed with which supporters signed up to Facebook after ElBaradei returned to Egypt in February, adding tens of thousands in a few days, reflects pent-up frustration before parliament and presidential elections this year and next, analysts say.
However, they say the challenge is galvanizing the masses in a country where opposition parties are weak, where police crush even modest protests and where the banned Muslim Brotherhood, the biggest opposition group, has shunned action on the streets.
“It’s unrealistic to think that online activism can turn things around without the existence of an opposition that can challenge the state,” political analyst Amr Hamzawy said. “There is a clear lack of constituency building on the ground.”
Iran is cited as an example of how social networking tools can help rally hundreds of thousands. In the Islamic Republic, Twitter and other sites were used to draw protesters out against last year’s presidential election, which they said was rigged.
However, opposition voices in Iran, even within the confines set by the Islamic Republic’s political system, are a more potent force than in Egypt where opposition parties are fragmented and have limited popular following.
“What bloggers did was expose the power of Iran’s opposition ... Egypt does not have this grassroots audience,” said Rabab el Mahdi, a professor at the American University of Cairo.
The Muslim Brotherhood, banned under a law against any political group being based on religion, is the only group in Egypt with a network across the nation that could, analysts say, bring tens of thousands onto the streets if it chose.
However, the Brotherhood is wary of a confrontation that could bring a crushing security response, threatening the group’s existence, analysts say. It has shunned street protests to focus on its medical and other social programs to build support.
Even modest protests in Egypt draw an overwhelming, and often violent, police response. However, heavy-handed security has also been part of the reason activists have taken to the Web.
“At one point the dynamism died down and activists found it difficult to mobilize in large numbers ... so they shifted to online gatherings,” blogger Hossam Hamalawy said.
Facebook became a platform for rallying dissidents in 2008, after the April Sixth Youth movement drew more than 70,000 supporters to its page to back a strike over surging food prices. Protests on April 6 of that year had led to clashes with police.
This year, on the anniversary of the 2008 protests, demonstrators turned out in Cairo chanting “Down, down, Hosni Mubarak.” Just a few hundred turned up, small by global standards, but a rarity in Egypt. Heavily outnumbered by police, many protesters were beaten before the demonstration ended.
It has been a similar story at follow-up protests.
Creating momentum may be a challenge for online activists in Egypt, a country of 78 million where the UN puts illiteracy at 34 percent and Internet penetration at 17 percent.
Iran, with a comparable population, has illiteracy of 18 percent and Internet usage of 31 percent.
Yet Egypt’s government is still wary of the Web community.
The Internet is not policed as in Iran or some other Arab states where sites, including Facebook, are blocked, but bloggers and Web activists have been detained. Rights groups say Egypt has used a long-standing emergency law to do so.
This month Cairo extended the law, already in place for almost three decades, for two more years, but said it would limit usage to terror and narcotics cases. Rights groups are skeptical.
Aware of the limits of the Web, some online ElBaradei supporters have gone offline by gathering signatures for a petition demanding constitutional changes and more freedom.
Yusuf AbdelRahman, representing ElBaradei’s Facebook group, said the petition had 54,870 online signatures so far, but added that 15,000 Facebook members have volunteered to go on the streets of Cairo and other cities to collect more signatures.
“[This] is a crucial step considering that three decades of state repression has left many afraid of taking action. Others accept repressive measures as a fact of life,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers