Yesterday marked President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) second year in office and the midway point of his four-year term.
In the build-up to the anniversary, the media has been awash with surveys and polls rating almost everything, from Taiwan’s current economic situation and support for a planned economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, to Ma’s popularity and even his chances of re-election against prospective opposition presidential candidates in 2012.
Of course, the government immediately jumped on the positive, with particular attention being given to the International Institute for Management Development’s (IMD) latest world competitiveness report, which saw Taiwan jump from 23rd to eighth position, indicating increased competitiveness and government efficiency. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) was quick to take the plaudits.
Yet US-Taiwan Business Council Chairman Paul Wolfowitz also mentioned in a speech this week that Taiwan was ranked 46th in the World Bank’s annual Doing Business report, far behind the other three Asian “tiger” economies, with Singapore and Hong Kong in the top three.
Needless to say, the government was not so keen to highlight the results of this particular poll, and while the two reports focused on different aspects of Taiwan’s business environment, they did show the wealth of statistics that are available to people wanting to state a particular case.
This phenomenon has also been prevalent with regard to statistics and polling related to the ECFA, with reports about the economic benefits differing widely in their findings.
Government-affiliated think tanks have produced largely rosy post-ECFA predictions of GDP growth and job opportunities, while their adversaries have painted gloomy scenarios of shattered industries and job losses totaling hundreds of thousands.
Opinion polls have also mimicked this pattern, with government and pro-unification media surveys showing growing support for the pact, while the pro-independence polls have shown that opposition to signing an ECFA is strong.
With all this opposing information, it is no wonder that the public remains confused.
The result of such polling is also the reason why a growing number of people in Taiwan no longer have faith in such results.
It is a fact that statistics and polls can be manipulated to support even the most unpopular arguments, hence the adage “there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics.”
The premier probably had this in mind when he said he wanted to achieve a 60 percent public approval rating before the ECFA is signed. Even with time running out as the government’s self-imposed June deadline approaches and public opinion on the subject remains divided, Wu knows full well that there is a pollster out there somewhere that can produce the desired result.
However, while the government may be able to fudge the numbers to give it a mandate to sign an ECFA, one thing the polls have been consistent on is the continued low approval rating of Ma and his administration.
Should it continue to rule in the arrogant, arbitrary manner it has employed in its first two years, then this government will be voted out in 2012, something no amount of positive statistics will be able to prevent.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS