One of the eternal themes of Chinese history is that “he who conquers is crowned king, he who fails is a brigand.” Official histories have mostly been written by those in power, while stirring tales of the vanquished circulate as unofficial histories or folk tales. The history of Whampoa Military Academy is viewed differently in China and Taiwan, but there is one common factor — the role of academy founder Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙).
Sun was chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and is considered the father of the Republic of China. From Beijing’s point of view, Sun was a pioneer of the Chinese revolution and his historical status is on a par with Mao Zedong (毛澤東). This shared respect for Sun has led to a relative decline in the status of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), the long-term commandant of the academy. This focus is evident in the title of a forum on the subject held in Taipei a few days ago: “Dr Sun Yat-sen, the Whampoa Military Academy and Cross-Strait Relations.”
All speakers at the forum, when talking about Sun, echoed one another in calling for people to adhere to the spirit of our forebears and to promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.
In reality, the real founding father of the academy, which was established in 1924, was Chiang. It was he who established the Whampoa revolutionary spirit that was to inspire the Northern Expedition and the war of resistance against Japan. However, Chiang did not choose his friends wisely. Many of those who later rose in rebellion against him were former students and colleagues.
In the end, Chiang was defeated and withdrew to Taiwan where he died in 1975.
The Whampoa graduates Chiang brought with him to Taiwan are now forgetting their roots. Instead, they echo China’s version of history and that of the Whampoa graduates who threw their lot in with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), by suggesting above all else that the academy represented a period of successful united front cooperation between the KMT and the CCP thanks to former Chinese premier Zhou Enlai (周恩來), who was director of the academy’s political department. They also reiterated the claim that Zhou, on his deathbed, called on his countrymen not to forget Taiwan — meaning the task of unifying Taiwan with China.
Whampoa Military Academy enrolled students for six academic terms during the first KMT-CCP united front (1923-1927), during which 7,399 graduated from the first five intakes, but only 718 from the sixth in February 1929. Graduates of these first six intakes enjoyed high status and strong influence in KMT military circles. Moreover, there was a strict adherence to seniority favoring earlier graduates, who went on to exert considerable influence over those who followed.
Few graduates of this period are still alive in either Taiwan or China, so the recent forum was dominated by later graduates. The theme they chose was: “Uphold Sun Yat-sen’s principles, enhance and glorify the Whampoa spirit and promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.”
Chiang’s role was intentionally glossed over, probably because of his staunch opposition to communism and his adherence to the camp of democratic nations. After all, Article 1 of the KMT Charter says that the party’s purpose is to “realize a free, democratic Republic of China in which every citizen prospers,” and that is something that will not change anytime soon.
There is nothing wrong with Whampoa alumni engaging in lively debate, but it no longer has anything to do with the Whampoa spirit. The CCP’s version of Whampoa is dominated by Marxism-Leninism and the ideologies of Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) and it is seen as a precursor to the People’s Liberation Army.
In contrast, Taiwan has long since nationalized its armed forces so that they are now loyal not to the KMT, but to the democratic state and the people, as expressed in the motto “Nation, duty, honor.” In this sense, the armed forces of China and Taiwan could not be more different.
It’s fine to have a forum if it is just a social activity for academy alumni, but if it has the ulterior motive of borrowing from historical Whampoa to encourage Taiwanese to support the government’s approach to cross-strait relations today, then it inevitably runs up against the fact that the military systems of Taiwan and China are fundamentally different.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past