In a world where the daily news feeds us a strong dose of war, famine, environmental calamity and man’s general inhumanity to man, positive stories are rare. Human goodness simply isn’t as “newsworthy” as, say, the latest bloody clashes in the streets of Bangkok.
That is not to say that there is no place in the news for nice, heart-warming stories like the one about vegetable vendor Chen Shu-chu (陳樹菊), who earlier this month was flown to New York City to receive an award for her years of generous deeds. There is always a place for such stories and many people wish there were more.
However, when a person’s selflessness is hijacked by the government for political purposes, it is a travesty and the good news turns sour. This, sadly, was exactly what has happened with Chen and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration bears full responsibility for making a mockery of everything the humble lady from Taitung County stands for.
From the minute the announcement was made that Time magazine would honor Chen in New York, government officials turned the whole thing into a circus. Ministry of Foreign Affairs officials intervened to make sure she received a speedy visa from the American Institute in Taiwan. Then, an evidently overwhelmed Chen was repeatedly coached by ministry officials during media interviews in New York to thank Ma, the government and to state that she “represented the president and the minister of foreign affairs.”
When did the celebration of a person’s good deeds turn into a public relations opportunity for the government? Chen didn’t represent Ma, the government or the ministry — she represented herself.
For an embattled administration with unenviable approval ratings, however, the temptation was too great. Out of the blue (even if the Liberty Times first reported her philanthropy nearly four years ago and Forbes magazine hailed her in March) came this timely gift from the east in whose bright light the entire administration could bask to make itself look good. To add insult to injury, some legislators have suggested including Chen’s story in textbooks for elementary and high-school teachers. They have also floated the idea of a biography, while the Government Information Office has reportedly been mulling a movie biopic.
This would all be farcical were it not so reminiscent of state propaganda across the Taiwan Strait. Remember the young short-track speed skater Zhou Yang (周洋), who in February was chided by Chinese Vice Sports Minister Yu Zaiqing (于再清) for thanking her parents — but not her country — after winning gold at the Vancouver Winter Games? In this context, the individual becomes faceless, swallowed by a brand of nationalism that in reality is good publicity for the ruling elite and nothing more.
The government’s exploitation of Chen serves another, equally disturbing, purpose. It provides a timely distraction at a time when Taiwanese should be focusing on issues of tremendous importance to the nation’s future, among them the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement with China and whether to allow Chinese to study in Taiwan. Moreover, by bombarding us with the feel-good Chen story, the government hopes the public will somehow fail to notice that the legislature has been completely sidelined. The government hopes we will ignore its assault on the freedom of the press, the politicization of the judiciary, the secret deals with China and the exclusion of the majority from decisions that will affect the future of the country.
Chen deserves recognition and the thanks of the people she helped. How the Ma administration has exploited her story, however, is crass and comes straight out of the Chinese propaganda handbook.
“Testy,” “divisive,” “frigid,” “an exchange of insults” were some of the media descriptions of last month’s meeting in Anchorage, Alaska, between US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan and their Chinese counterparts. Council on Foreign Relations president Richard Haass said that, rather than the “deft handling” needed in US-China relations, this encounter was “mishandled, a terrible start [with] way too much public signaling.” Yet, contrary to conventional wisdom, the acrimonious encounter with Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) and Chinese Central Foreign Affairs Commission Director Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) was a great success for US diplomacy
In studies of Taiwan’s demographic changes, the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica has found that a mere 36.5 percent of men and 19.6 percent of women think getting married is an important life event. The institute also found that the government spending money or amending laws and regulations in order to encourage families to have children is having no impact on the birthrate. Opinions differ on whether this kind of change is a matter of national security, as Japan faces a similar situation, without having a negative impact on its economic strength. Fewer women are willing to marry and the divorce
Early last month, China’s rubber-stamp legislature, the National People’s Congress (NPC), officially approved the country’s 14th Five-Year Plan. The strategy was supposed to demonstrate that China has a long-term economic vision that would enable it to thrive, despite its geopolitical contest with the US. However, before the ink on the NPC’s stamp could dry, China had already begun sabotaging the plan’s chances of success. The new plan’s centerpiece is the “dual-circulation” strategy, according to which China would aim to foster growth based on domestic demand and technological self-sufficiency. This would not only reduce China’s reliance on external demand; it would also
Interrupting the assimilation of Xinjiang’s Uighur population would result in an unmanageable national security threat to China. Numerous governments and civil society organizations around the world have accused China of massive human rights abuses in Xinjiang, and labeled Beijing’s inhumane and aggressive social re-engineering efforts in the region as “cultural genocide.” Extensive evidence shows that China’s forceful ethnic assimilation policies in Xinjiang are aimed at replacing Uighur ethnic and religious identity with a so-called scientific communist dogma and Han Chinese culture. The total assimilation of Uighurs into the larger “Chinese family” is also Beijing’s official, central purpose of its ethnic policies