Expo 2010 Shanghai China recently opened under the full glare of the world’s media. For the duration of this 184-day event, 246 countries and organizations will vie for attention and compete to promote their own interests. By making the city its main theme, Expo 2010 marks the arrival of the urban age.
Statistics show that people living in urban areas constituted more than half the world’s total population in 2007. Every second person now lives in a city, and the trend of global urbanization is unstoppable.
Against this backdrop, one of the biggest challenges facing humankind this century will be solving a wide variety of urban problems and building a people-friendly urban living environment.
By the same token, the way in which we view and manage cities will change as scientific and technological advances are made. For example, the city will no longer be seen as an engineering and architectural construct. Rather, it will be seen as a “living body” belonging to the life sciences.
Solutions must not be restricted to urban design and planning as prescribed by the domains of civil engineering and architecture. Instead, cities need to adopt a far broader view of city management, incorporating governance, administration, planning and legislation.
In particular, space in a city and the activities that take place in that space are so closely interrelated that urban issues such as traffic, land use and housing can no longer can be dealt with independently. Modern problems are best handled through an urban management approach that treats the city as a holistic, complex entity, as that facilitates the effective solution of urban problems and, by extension, sustainable development.
In short, traditional urban planning requires a new paradigm that seeks to re-envision what a city is and develop accompanying methods for managing it.
The question is whether Taiwan is ready for this new era. The government lacks an overall vision for the development of Taiwan’s cities, and it is this that lies behind the merger and upgrading of existing cities and counties to form five special municipalities. At the same time, urban development in Taipei city continues to be restricted by regulations governing floor area incentives in urban renewal buildings. In the face of such developments, I remain extremely concerned that Taiwanese cities will lose their competitiveness.
Lai Shih-kung is a professor in the Department of Real Estate and Built Environment of the College of Public Affairs at National Taipei University.
TRANSLATED BY WU TAIJING
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with