Thailand’s monarchy
I wish to refer to the article by Sin-Ming Shaw (“Thailand in denial,” April 24, page 9). It is always a pleasure to hear foreigners’ opinions regarding Thailand, especially from those who are currently based in Thailand. However, there are some misconceptions, which regrettably is not uncommon among some foreigners.
First, with regards to the Forbes report on the world’s richest royals published on Aug. 20, 2008, which ranked His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand in first place, the Crown Property Bureau has clarified that the report is inaccurate and inconsistent. The report included land and other assets belonging to the Crown Property Bureau, which is not in His Majesty’s personal net worth. Thus, the figure stated in the report should be considered too high.
Second, the Thai monarchy is and remains within the Constitution and above politics. The Thai monarchy has never been a player in politics. While some political groups may have advocated their cause by claiming royal support, any attempts to drag the palace into discussions about the current political conflict and portraying it as a partisan actor are simply wrong and misleading. Any perception of power and influence derives from the respect and reverence that the His Majesty has earned from his over 60-years working in the field, including in the most remote and inaccessible parts of the country, for the good of his people.
Finally, Thailand upholds people’s rights to freedom of speech and expression as guaranteed by the Constitution. The so-call lese majeste law does not prohibit discussions about the country’s monarchical institution or its political future. However, the issue is difficult for Thais to discuss, especially when the country has had such a beloved and respected monarch for so long, it is normal that people may feel anxious and unsettled about the future. It is also typical for many Asian cultures, including that of Taiwan, not to talk about inauspicious matters, particularly when it concerns someone whom you love and respect.
Nichamon Agrasuta
Chief of the information section of the Thailand Trade and Economic Office
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US