Last week, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) wrote a sentimental remembrance of a former leader of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Hu Yaobang (胡耀邦), which was reported by a leading US newspaper. For those of us who are old enough to remember, Hu was the first heir apparent to Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), but was later dumped by Deng because the conservative wing did not like him. His sudden death in April 1989 continues to be viewed as the chief catalyst to the student movement that eventually ended tragically on June 4 of that year.
Given the connection between Hu’s death and what was arguably the most significant socio-political movement in post-Mao China, it is not at all surprising that China watchers are wondering about the significance of Wen’s remembrance. The fact that it was published in the People’s Daily, the CCP’s mouthpiece, further stirs the imagination of professionals who spend their lifetimes trying to figure out what is happening behind the doors of the leadership compound in Beijing.
Although it is still too early to say it is a mistake to suggest that this remembrance indicates the coming of major political changes in China, ie, democracy, it is best to go beyond Hu and examine the content of the remembrance in light of recent events and in the context of contemporary China.
A quick read of the remembrance will show that the essay has the following themes: (1) Hu loved the people, especially the downtrodden; (2) his visits to southern and southwestern China, including Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi provinces, were motivated by compassion and interest in the disadvantaged; and (3) Wen was with him during those visits.
Now let’s put these themes in the context of present-day China. Thirty years of economic modernization have made China a richer country, but have also made the rich richer and the poor poorer. As a result of the efforts of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) predecessor, capitalists are now allowed to be members of the CCP, which historically claims to represent only the workers and the peasants. Although no event like the student movement of 1989 has reoccurred (the public aspect of the Falun Gong movement ended rather swiftly), by the Chinese government’s own admission, protests and “mass incidents” are on the rise. Those mass incidents usually involve the less fortunate members of Chinese society.
Meanwhile, official corruption is on the rise and the top leadership of the CCP is using a combination of exhortation, training and public campaigns to demonstrate that it is doing an effective job of cleaning house, all in an effort to soothe the public. Recently, the top official in charge of anti-corruption matters wrote an essay that repeated calls for CCP members to become exemplars and servants of the people. In the last two years, CCP leaders of the over 2,000 counties in China were mandated to receive “training” at the Central Party School in Beijing to learn how to effectively handle mass incidents. Finally, the highly publicized crackdown on the corrupt police force of Chongqing municipality has captured domestic and international attention.
Furthermore, Yunnan, Guizhou and Guangxi provinces are suffering a historic drought. Wen, charged with direct responsibility for economic and development issues, has visited the areas in question with tears in his eyes and apologies on his lips. Even before the recent crisis in these areas, “Grandpa Wen” had already captivated the hearts and minds of people in China and beyond by issuing live, in-person apologies to the people stranded at a train station during the big snowstorm of 2008 that blanketed all of southern China, and for his seeming omnipresence during the Sichuan earthquake relief effort in 2008.
Placing Wen’s emotional writing into this context, it seems pretty obvious that Wen’s remembrance is an appeal to the Chinese people that the party-state recognizes the plight of the common people and that CCP officials must never forget the importance of staying in touch with the people. In this sense, Hu Yaobang serves as a great role model. Moreover, the current administration under Hu Jintao and Wen should be credited for their emphasis on the creation of a “harmonious society,” ie, a society with greater equality and distributive justice.
In other words, Wen’s writing is unlikely to indicate a shifting of the political wind. The reality is that fewer and fewer people, both inside and outside China, still speak of democracy as an inevitable or even desirable political outcome in China. A more significant question in many people’s minds is how the party-state can govern more effectively. What is interesting about Wen’s essay, then, is not the mention of Hu Yaobang. What is interesting is that it seems to be evoking images of the past, those of a revolutionary party staying close to its roots. Yet, as Wen calls on the CCP to remember its roots, his essay also reveals an ideologically bankrupt state that is running out of new ways to govern effectively, so much so that it now must call upon the ghosts of its past to save its present and future.
I sincerely wish Grandpa Wen success in his endeavor, but somehow his readers are bound to misread him or his words will fall on deaf ears. That would be unfortunate.
John W. Tai is a doctoral candidate at George Washington University. Since 2007, he has resided in Beijing and Shanghai, where he is researching and writing his dissertation. He also teaches and administers a US university study-abroad program.
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS