From Burmese pythons to pygmy marmosets, there is a roaring illegal trade in animals online. A recent convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species found one rare species — the Kaiser’s spotted newt (an orange and black salamander in the highland streams of Iran) — now numbers fewer than 1,000 adults in the wild because of Internet trading. So what can you find on the Internet? In just one day, I discovered dealers who appear to be selling some of the rarest species on Earth.
PLOUGHSHARE TORTOISE
Within a few hours, I was staring at an advert for one of the world’s most endangered creatures. It read: “Very superb, jumbo size and most of all very rare.”
Only 200 mature ploughshare tortoises survive in the bamboo scrub lands of north Madagascar; the rest, it seems, are online. And what would this pair of 30-year-old tortoises cost? £24,000 (US$37,000), and a trip to Kuala Lumpur: There’s no international shipping.
BURMESE STARRED TORTOISE
It is against the law to remove the critically endangered Burmese starred tortoise from the forests of Myanmar, but I easily found an apparent seller in Bangkok, Thailand. The dealer’s picture features 35 turtles in a laundry basket lined with newspaper and wilted lettuce. Ten years ago, a survey by the Wildlife Conservation Society found few specimens in the wild. They did, however, find a tortoise trader in every village. This seller was asking £320 in cash for each specimen.
BOSC’S MONITOR LIZARD AND BALL PYTHON
One classified advert offered a “snake show” and “horse riding” along with Bosc’s monitor lizards (£70) and ball pythons (£ 75). International law requires that these African species come with permits from their country of origin — conservationists worry that few wild-caught Bosc’s survive to maturity in captivity and supplies are replenished from wild populations. The ad doesn’t mention permits.
PARROTS AND MACAWS
A Google search for pet birds turned up an eight-year old Tucuman Amazon (£450) in Canada. The seller claimed the bird is from the wild, which would make it illegal: After 20,000 Tucumans left Argentina in the 1980s to become pets, international trade in the species was banned in 1990.
ELEPHANT IVORY
In 2008, eBay banned the sale of ivory, finding it impossible to ensure trade was legal. It’s still available online, however. I called one dealer who seemed knowledgeable about the required permits; the same can’t be said of many online sellers. Some nod to legality by claiming their ivory is antique; others don’t bother. On Craigslist I found an “Endangered Species Ivory Neclace” (sic) in California (US$120). The seller claims it’s “circa 1980,” but without a permit, there’s no way to tell.
HAWKSBILL TURTLE
In Japan, artisans began carving hawksbill shells — the only true source of tortoiseshell — in the 1700s, but banned import of the critically endangered sea turtle in 1993. I found what appeared to be a tortoiseshell item on eBay: A “Brand New Takayama Ex-Takahashi Chikudo Model Shamisen Bekko Bachi Plectrum.” It’s a pic for a banjo-like Japanese instrument. The seller in New York promised a “natural material” of premium grade. Price US$370, will ship worldwide.
SHAHTOOSH
It takes the wool from five dead Tibetan antelope to make one shawl. That means you could get about 30,000 luxury garments from the herd estimated to remain in north western Tibet. It’s illegal worldwide to sell the wool, but I found an online dealer in Kashmir claiming to sell shahtoosh shawls along with “fancy wicker baskets.” Price unlisted.
RADIATED TORTOISE
In the wild, the radiated tortoise spends its days munching cactus in the bush lands of southern Madagascar. “Sub zero,” a dealer in Prai, Malaysia, has two that are two-and-a-half years into a life that can last for 100. This pair could outlive the population as a whole: Scientists have predicted it is headed for collapse in the next half century because of habitat loss and the wildlife trade. Price £710 and £1,220, although Sub zero is offering a “mega discount.”
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
RSS