A recent World Bank report demonstrates that money invested in encouraging women to join the workforce represents one of the most intelligent uses of resources in the 21st century. This conclusion was based on the fact that female employment brings benefits beyond the individual as it also has direct implications for their children and families. Our own experience at the Garden of Hope Foundation concurs with this finding.
We believe that getting female victims of domestic violence into paid employment is by far the most cost-effective form of social welfare, as it takes non-productive members of society who are reliant on social welfare and helps them become productive individuals able to raise a family and contribute to society.
The last few years have been tough for businesses and households across the board, with companies having to close their doors and countless numbers of ordinary people seeing their businesses fail. It is often women who feel the brunt of these changes, something painfully reflected in the way reports of domestic violence increase in direct proportion to rises in unemployment.
From 2005 to last year, the number of domestic violence cases reported to the police increased from 39,644 to 48,098. Of course, not all victims come forward and if you factor in the number of unreported cases, we see a similar picture to that contained in UN statistics which indicate that one in every four or five women around the world is a victim of domestic violence. Violence of this sort comes at enormous cost to the public purse in terms of police time and resources and medical bills, as well as the fact that the victims find it impossible to hold down a job and consequently rely on welfare — a further economic burden on the state.
Both the government and civic groups provide much help and information, including follow-up support such as accompanying victims to seek medical assistance, emergency relief, sheltered accommodation, help with legal matters and psychological counseling.
However, it is our experience that, regardless of how much effort and how many resources are plowed into helping victims of domestic violence, almost half of the women who make use of these services end up back with their abusive partner because of children or the difficulty they experience in finding employment.
In addition, a full 90 percent of this group will suffer a repeat of the violence and once again be forced to rely on social welfare resources. Clearly, there is a need to re-evaluate whether this form of residual welfare is actually working or not.
In fact, it should not cost too much to improve the provision of social services in Taiwan. It will mean giving female victims of domestic violence who want to work the time and space to get themselves together and adapt to a professional work environment, helping them cope with barriers to employment and organize things like day-care for their children. This will equip them with what they need to enter a competitive job market and achieve economic independence. At the same time, this is the only way they can reasonably expect to have the resources or opportunity to extricate themselves from their current difficulties.
Victims of domestic violence find themselves up against all kinds of barriers and prejudices when it comes to seeking employment, and at first they lack the confidence and resources needed. With the right kind of assistance, however, these women really can sort themselves out. At 80 percent, the success rate with this initiative has proven to be much higher than the average reported in ordinary back-to-work centers, which is closer to 30 percent.
On average, a victim of domestic violence requires about six months of support, at a cost of NT$200,000 (US$6,340) to NT$300,000, depending on the individual’s circumstances. This money goes into paying salaries and day-care fees, as well as the facilities, materials and training needed to prepare for a return to a professional work environment, as well as wages for administrative support and other related costs.
If that figure seems a little high, bear in mind the fact that if they are successful in getting a job they will be earning around NT$20,000 to NT$30,000 a month, which means the cost of the investment will be “recouped” in less than a year.
What’s more, they will then be able to make a contribution to society as productive members of the workforce, and no longer rely on the social welfare system.
Hopefully this approach will finally bring an end to the long-held misconception that social welfare is tantamount to doling out aid to those who fall through the holes in the social system. It can also be an effective way of ensuring that those members of our society who would otherwise be reliant on welfare and an economic burden on society, actually become economically productive people, able to raise families and hold their heads up high.
Seen like this, such programs are also the most cost-effective way forward and the smartest use of money for the future, something in which a forward-looking government or society would not hesitate to invest.
Chi Hui-jung is executive director of the Garden of Hope Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers