A recent World Bank report demonstrates that money invested in encouraging women to join the workforce represents one of the most intelligent uses of resources in the 21st century. This conclusion was based on the fact that female employment brings benefits beyond the individual as it also has direct implications for their children and families. Our own experience at the Garden of Hope Foundation concurs with this finding.
We believe that getting female victims of domestic violence into paid employment is by far the most cost-effective form of social welfare, as it takes non-productive members of society who are reliant on social welfare and helps them become productive individuals able to raise a family and contribute to society.
The last few years have been tough for businesses and households across the board, with companies having to close their doors and countless numbers of ordinary people seeing their businesses fail. It is often women who feel the brunt of these changes, something painfully reflected in the way reports of domestic violence increase in direct proportion to rises in unemployment.
From 2005 to last year, the number of domestic violence cases reported to the police increased from 39,644 to 48,098. Of course, not all victims come forward and if you factor in the number of unreported cases, we see a similar picture to that contained in UN statistics which indicate that one in every four or five women around the world is a victim of domestic violence. Violence of this sort comes at enormous cost to the public purse in terms of police time and resources and medical bills, as well as the fact that the victims find it impossible to hold down a job and consequently rely on welfare — a further economic burden on the state.
Both the government and civic groups provide much help and information, including follow-up support such as accompanying victims to seek medical assistance, emergency relief, sheltered accommodation, help with legal matters and psychological counseling.
However, it is our experience that, regardless of how much effort and how many resources are plowed into helping victims of domestic violence, almost half of the women who make use of these services end up back with their abusive partner because of children or the difficulty they experience in finding employment.
In addition, a full 90 percent of this group will suffer a repeat of the violence and once again be forced to rely on social welfare resources. Clearly, there is a need to re-evaluate whether this form of residual welfare is actually working or not.
In fact, it should not cost too much to improve the provision of social services in Taiwan. It will mean giving female victims of domestic violence who want to work the time and space to get themselves together and adapt to a professional work environment, helping them cope with barriers to employment and organize things like day-care for their children. This will equip them with what they need to enter a competitive job market and achieve economic independence. At the same time, this is the only way they can reasonably expect to have the resources or opportunity to extricate themselves from their current difficulties.
Victims of domestic violence find themselves up against all kinds of barriers and prejudices when it comes to seeking employment, and at first they lack the confidence and resources needed. With the right kind of assistance, however, these women really can sort themselves out. At 80 percent, the success rate with this initiative has proven to be much higher than the average reported in ordinary back-to-work centers, which is closer to 30 percent.
On average, a victim of domestic violence requires about six months of support, at a cost of NT$200,000 (US$6,340) to NT$300,000, depending on the individual’s circumstances. This money goes into paying salaries and day-care fees, as well as the facilities, materials and training needed to prepare for a return to a professional work environment, as well as wages for administrative support and other related costs.
If that figure seems a little high, bear in mind the fact that if they are successful in getting a job they will be earning around NT$20,000 to NT$30,000 a month, which means the cost of the investment will be “recouped” in less than a year.
What’s more, they will then be able to make a contribution to society as productive members of the workforce, and no longer rely on the social welfare system.
Hopefully this approach will finally bring an end to the long-held misconception that social welfare is tantamount to doling out aid to those who fall through the holes in the social system. It can also be an effective way of ensuring that those members of our society who would otherwise be reliant on welfare and an economic burden on society, actually become economically productive people, able to raise families and hold their heads up high.
Seen like this, such programs are also the most cost-effective way forward and the smartest use of money for the future, something in which a forward-looking government or society would not hesitate to invest.
Chi Hui-jung is executive director of the Garden of Hope Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US