“People were shot. We went there and found people lying all over the ground. But something amazing happened. There was a black cloud. For 15 minutes it rained heavily after the shooting. It washed all the blood … ”
Ikabot Makiti’s voice trails off into quiet sobs. The former student activist cannot forget the strewn corpses of men, women and children, or the mass burials that followed. Half a century has passed but memories of the Sharpeville massacre still run deep.
Yesterday marked the 50th anniversary of the day that changed the course of South African history. When police opened fire on thousands of unarmed protesters, killing 69 and injuring about 180, they inadvertently provided a catalyst for decades of armed struggle and forced the rest of the world to confront the iniquity of apartheid. White minority rule finally collapsed in 1994. Two years later, it was in Sharpeville that the country’s first black president, Nelson Mandela, signed a new Constitution.
Named after the Glaswegian immigrant John Lillie Sharp, Sharpeville is a township about 50km south of Johannesburg. Black people were forcibly relocated here and in 1960 it had only two tarred roads with electric lighting.
On March 21 that year, the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC), a breakaway organization from the African National Congress, mobilized black people across the country to demonstrate against laws that controlled their movement.
Thousands gathered outside the local police station in Sharpeville, challenging the police to arrest them for being without the pass books, or dompas, they were meant to produce on demand.
Makiti, who at the time was a 17-year-old PAC member, recalled that the demonstrators were in high spirits, holding umbrellas and throwing their hats in the air.
“There was jubilation around, not anything that suggested people were angry or wanting to fight,” said the grandfather, who later spent five years imprisoned on Robben Island. “They were waiting for the answer and the answer came with the bullet. I think the police just panicked because of the mob.”
Without warning, the police opened fire on the crowd. Most of those who died were shot in the back as they fled.
Piet Tshabalala, 86, recalled: “Something hit me on the leg and I saw blood. The pregnant woman next to me lay in a pool of blood after being shot in the stomach.”
The bullets hit another pregnant girl, 16-year-old Ziphora Mameho, but she survived.
“The people were demanding a response and the police started shooting. I ran for a few meters but was shot in the leg. The person I was running with died,” she said.
“The other guys commanded me to stay down because otherwise I’d be shot. I said I’d rather die because I didn’t have a leg to use. I remember an Afrikaner [white] policeman stopping and saying: ‘Now you’ve received the Africa you were fighting for,’” Mameho said.
Mameho, now 66, rolls down a sock to show uneven bones beneath her scarred skin. She spent 18 months in hospital, where doctors inserted her short rib in her leg, and she gave birth to a son, Samwell, without complications.
The anniversary is marked every year as Human Rights Day across South Africa. This year Deputy South African President Kgalema Motlanthe was scheduled to address a commemorative rally in Sharpeville.
But political freedom has not delivered economic freedom for its residents. The roads are potholed and some still lack tarmac, rubbish is strewn on wasteland and the stadium where Mandela signed the Constitution is run down. Unemployment is rife and two schools recently closed.
“Apartheid made us despair. Even though today our kids have better lives, we struggle,” Mameho said. “We suffer because of the hardships and we don’t have money for medical attention.”
Last month people took to the streets, burning tires in protest at poor service delivery, and once again the crack of police gunfire was heard in Sharpeville.
Hofni Mosesi, an executive of the Concerned Residents of Sharpeville, said: “It blurs the difference between the apartheid government and our government. We feel bitter about it if it happens today, if it’s done by the government we voted into power.”
He said while the ANC remembers Sharpeville on the anniversary, it is neglected for the other 364 days of the year.
“This township is just good as far as March 21 is concerned; otherwise, nothing else, forget about it,” he said.
Asked if he felt the sacrifices of 1960 had been in vain, Mosesi said: “To us, it was worth it. It could be that it’s not worth it to our present authorities, because if it was worth something, our township wouldn’t be in the state it’s in at the moment. The government has betrayed that legacy.
“At some stage all hell will break loose. We don’t know when. There will come a point when we say we have done everything in our power,” he said.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past
President-elect William Lai (賴清德) is to accede to the presidency this month at a time when the international order is in its greatest flux in three decades. Lai must navigate the ship of state through the choppy waters of an assertive China that is refusing to play by the rules, challenging the territorial claims of multiple nations and increasing its pressure on Taiwan. It is widely held in democratic capitals that Taiwan is important to the maintenance and survival of the liberal international order. Taiwan is strategically located, hemming China’s People’s Liberation Army inside the first island chain, preventing it from