“People were shot. We went there and found people lying all over the ground. But something amazing happened. There was a black cloud. For 15 minutes it rained heavily after the shooting. It washed all the blood … ”
Ikabot Makiti’s voice trails off into quiet sobs. The former student activist cannot forget the strewn corpses of men, women and children, or the mass burials that followed. Half a century has passed but memories of the Sharpeville massacre still run deep.
Yesterday marked the 50th anniversary of the day that changed the course of South African history. When police opened fire on thousands of unarmed protesters, killing 69 and injuring about 180, they inadvertently provided a catalyst for decades of armed struggle and forced the rest of the world to confront the iniquity of apartheid. White minority rule finally collapsed in 1994. Two years later, it was in Sharpeville that the country’s first black president, Nelson Mandela, signed a new Constitution.
Named after the Glaswegian immigrant John Lillie Sharp, Sharpeville is a township about 50km south of Johannesburg. Black people were forcibly relocated here and in 1960 it had only two tarred roads with electric lighting.
On March 21 that year, the Pan Africanist Congress (PAC), a breakaway organization from the African National Congress, mobilized black people across the country to demonstrate against laws that controlled their movement.
Thousands gathered outside the local police station in Sharpeville, challenging the police to arrest them for being without the pass books, or dompas, they were meant to produce on demand.
Makiti, who at the time was a 17-year-old PAC member, recalled that the demonstrators were in high spirits, holding umbrellas and throwing their hats in the air.
“There was jubilation around, not anything that suggested people were angry or wanting to fight,” said the grandfather, who later spent five years imprisoned on Robben Island. “They were waiting for the answer and the answer came with the bullet. I think the police just panicked because of the mob.”
Without warning, the police opened fire on the crowd. Most of those who died were shot in the back as they fled.
Piet Tshabalala, 86, recalled: “Something hit me on the leg and I saw blood. The pregnant woman next to me lay in a pool of blood after being shot in the stomach.”
The bullets hit another pregnant girl, 16-year-old Ziphora Mameho, but she survived.
“The people were demanding a response and the police started shooting. I ran for a few meters but was shot in the leg. The person I was running with died,” she said.
“The other guys commanded me to stay down because otherwise I’d be shot. I said I’d rather die because I didn’t have a leg to use. I remember an Afrikaner [white] policeman stopping and saying: ‘Now you’ve received the Africa you were fighting for,’” Mameho said.
Mameho, now 66, rolls down a sock to show uneven bones beneath her scarred skin. She spent 18 months in hospital, where doctors inserted her short rib in her leg, and she gave birth to a son, Samwell, without complications.
The anniversary is marked every year as Human Rights Day across South Africa. This year Deputy South African President Kgalema Motlanthe was scheduled to address a commemorative rally in Sharpeville.
But political freedom has not delivered economic freedom for its residents. The roads are potholed and some still lack tarmac, rubbish is strewn on wasteland and the stadium where Mandela signed the Constitution is run down. Unemployment is rife and two schools recently closed.
“Apartheid made us despair. Even though today our kids have better lives, we struggle,” Mameho said. “We suffer because of the hardships and we don’t have money for medical attention.”
Last month people took to the streets, burning tires in protest at poor service delivery, and once again the crack of police gunfire was heard in Sharpeville.
Hofni Mosesi, an executive of the Concerned Residents of Sharpeville, said: “It blurs the difference between the apartheid government and our government. We feel bitter about it if it happens today, if it’s done by the government we voted into power.”
He said while the ANC remembers Sharpeville on the anniversary, it is neglected for the other 364 days of the year.
“This township is just good as far as March 21 is concerned; otherwise, nothing else, forget about it,” he said.
Asked if he felt the sacrifices of 1960 had been in vain, Mosesi said: “To us, it was worth it. It could be that it’s not worth it to our present authorities, because if it was worth something, our township wouldn’t be in the state it’s in at the moment. The government has betrayed that legacy.
“At some stage all hell will break loose. We don’t know when. There will come a point when we say we have done everything in our power,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers