Amid complaints by Plurkers and concerns by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) following a tip-off from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲), CNN on Sunday corrected its Web site after initially quoting the US National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration’s Pacific Tsunami Warning Center as calling Taiwan “Chinese Taipei” in its tsunami watch report.
Despite its initial inertia and lack of awareness, the ministry deserves praise for swiftly responding to Kuan’s alert and requesting that CNN make the correction on its Web site.
If it hadn’t been for the complaints made by Taiwanese netizens and the government, the potential repercussions for Taiwan could have been dire. Wittingly or not, influential news networks like CNN can undermine the nation’s image through inadequate references.
As of yesterday, references to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei,” however, remained on the tsunami bulletin post on the center’s Web site. Kuan said the “Chinese Taipei” reference by the center, which falls under the jurisdiction of the US Department of Commerce, was a “serious matter,” as the US government until then had never referred to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei” in its official documents.
The controversy is not over and the ministry still has work to do. It, along with related national security agencies, should contact the Department of Commerce, the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center and determine where things went wrong. It should also ensure that the process, as well as its findings, are shared with the public.
While some may be quick to dismiss the matter as trivial and not worth further pursuit, we should be aware that silence and passivity are exactly what Beijing is counting on in its pursuit of unification.
Beijing’s efforts to marginalize Taiwan and diminish its international space are well known. It has resorted to many means — openly and clandestinely — to shape the global discourse on Taiwan, and this has often been accomplished through the use of language.
Although a lie repeated 1,000 times still doesn’t make it the truth, it could eventually manage to deceive the international community into believing that Taiwan is indeed part of China’s territory, of which the “Chinese Taipei” appellation is but one among many iterations.
If Taiwanese and their government do not speak out whenever Taiwan’s sovereign status is put into question or its name corrupted, it will only be a matter of time before the name Taiwan — or the nation’s official title, the Republic of China — is permanently removed from world maps.
Since taking office in May 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has engaged in a so-called diplomatic “truce” with Beijing, saying the country should concentrate more on cementing ties with allies than seeking to make new ones. While there may be wisdom in this, under no circumstances should this entail agreeing to this nation being referred to by a demeaning — and geographically incorrect — name such as “Chinese Taipei.”
Taiwanese cannot afford to be silent, especially when the greatest threat to Taiwan’s identity and survival as an independent nation comes from a giant whose voice echoes at every corner of the planet.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS