Amid complaints by Plurkers and concerns by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) following a tip-off from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲), CNN on Sunday corrected its Web site after initially quoting the US National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration’s Pacific Tsunami Warning Center as calling Taiwan “Chinese Taipei” in its tsunami watch report.
Despite its initial inertia and lack of awareness, the ministry deserves praise for swiftly responding to Kuan’s alert and requesting that CNN make the correction on its Web site.
If it hadn’t been for the complaints made by Taiwanese netizens and the government, the potential repercussions for Taiwan could have been dire. Wittingly or not, influential news networks like CNN can undermine the nation’s image through inadequate references.
As of yesterday, references to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei,” however, remained on the tsunami bulletin post on the center’s Web site. Kuan said the “Chinese Taipei” reference by the center, which falls under the jurisdiction of the US Department of Commerce, was a “serious matter,” as the US government until then had never referred to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei” in its official documents.
The controversy is not over and the ministry still has work to do. It, along with related national security agencies, should contact the Department of Commerce, the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration and the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center and determine where things went wrong. It should also ensure that the process, as well as its findings, are shared with the public.
While some may be quick to dismiss the matter as trivial and not worth further pursuit, we should be aware that silence and passivity are exactly what Beijing is counting on in its pursuit of unification.
Beijing’s efforts to marginalize Taiwan and diminish its international space are well known. It has resorted to many means — openly and clandestinely — to shape the global discourse on Taiwan, and this has often been accomplished through the use of language.
Although a lie repeated 1,000 times still doesn’t make it the truth, it could eventually manage to deceive the international community into believing that Taiwan is indeed part of China’s territory, of which the “Chinese Taipei” appellation is but one among many iterations.
If Taiwanese and their government do not speak out whenever Taiwan’s sovereign status is put into question or its name corrupted, it will only be a matter of time before the name Taiwan — or the nation’s official title, the Republic of China — is permanently removed from world maps.
Since taking office in May 2008, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has engaged in a so-called diplomatic “truce” with Beijing, saying the country should concentrate more on cementing ties with allies than seeking to make new ones. While there may be wisdom in this, under no circumstances should this entail agreeing to this nation being referred to by a demeaning — and geographically incorrect — name such as “Chinese Taipei.”
Taiwanese cannot afford to be silent, especially when the greatest threat to Taiwan’s identity and survival as an independent nation comes from a giant whose voice echoes at every corner of the planet.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS