Google recently announced without warning that it was considering withdrawing from the China market.
It said Chinese cyber criminals had compromised its Web site and tried to access the Gmail account details of certain Chinese dissidents.
Forgetting, for the time being, any direct implications of this, there is one particular aspect I would like to discuss.
The US and China are currently engaged in an economic dispute about the volume of cheap Chinese imports, which is forcing US companies to lay off workers.
The US government and some multinationals are very unhappy about the Chinese government’s conduct in this case. This dispute is only going to get more heated over the course of this year.
Against this backdrop, Taiwan’s government is pressing on with plans to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, which will align Taiwan more closely with the Chinese economy.
This will get Taiwan embroiled in difficult economic disputes with other countries.
As Google was making its announcement, US journalist Gerald Posner posted a story online discussing a confidential FBI report about the threat to US national security by a Chinese cyber army.
According to the report, the 180,000-strong retinue of criminals had the cyber equivalent of weapons of mass destruction at their disposal.
It says the People’s Liberation Army has developed a network of more than 30,000 military cyber spies, plus more than 150,000 private-sector computer experts.
The Pentagon alone received more than 90,000 sophisticated systematic and combined attacks last year, and this figure doesn’t include attacks on other US government departments, energy suppliers or other commercial institutions of strategic importance.
In fact, many multinationals are coming close to losing their patience with China.
Early last month, the directors and representatives of more than 70 chambers of commerce and industry, including those based in the US, Canada, South Korea and Japan, signed a joint letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) that objected to China’s attitude toward unfair competition.
It appears that Google is not alone in its frustration with China’s behavior.
Google does not have fixed investments in China, such as manufacturing plants or equipment. Its decision to leave China is based on considerations of market access alone.
Other companies may share Google’s scruples, but cannot make the decision to withdraw so lightly.
However, when those multinational companies that enthusiastically supported the idea of permanent most-favored-nation status for China become frustrated, and when this feeling of anger spills over to European, Japanese, Korean and Canadian companies, it’s not hard to see that the year ahead will see economic disputes breaking out between China and other countries.
If the government is blind to this situation and steps up integration with China, Taiwan may well find itself caught up in the economic dispute between China and the US.
China is even getting Taiwanese companies to sell Iran equipment that can be used in developing nuclear weapons.
This has prompted the EU to threaten action against Taiwan, and it is just the tip of the iceberg.
Will the government really continue to insist on continuing with this kind of economic suicide?
Lai I-chung is an executive member of Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS