Just as President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) rose to prominence because he managed to hide his true self, his fortunes are now plummeting because he has revealed his true colors. This outcome should be obvious, but he still doesn’t seem to have reflected on his behavior. Instead, he worries about the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) image over fears that honorary chairmen throwing a feast for and toasting Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) gave the public a negative image of the party.
When Ma blocked former KMT chairmen Lien Chan (連戰) and Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄), as well as People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) — all players in the old Chiang family camp — from hosting a dinner for their “old pal” Chen, he not only failed to cover up the KMT’s image as treasonous, but drew criticism for his arrogance and defeatist cross-strait policies.
As the trio criticized Ma while doting on the Chinese envoy, it became plain that Ma is not only incapable of suppressing corruption among the party’s lower echelons, but also of suppressing privileges among the politically powerful and influential KMT “nobility” in resisting manipulation by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It is only natural that the public saw through his charade.
Lien, Wu and Soong overstepped their bounds by doting on Chen. It looked bad, and their criticism of Ma was not very tactful. Lien said Taichung Mayor Jason Hu’s (胡志強) years at Oxford had not been a waste of time, thus implying that Ma had wasted his years at Harvard.
While that was a clever jab, Lien’s doctoral thesis, Chinese Communism Versus Pragmatism: The Criticism of Hu Shi’s Philosophy, detailed how the CCP purged the intellectual thought of Hu Shih (胡適), a philosopher and essayist who fled to Taiwan with Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) KMT forces. Lien has also served as the vice president of the Republic of China (ROC) and is now an honorary chairman of the KMT.
Despite this, he is unable to differentiate between what is important and what isn’t, so when he went to offer tribute to the “C-list” politician Chen, he only showed that he had wasted his years studying at the University of Chicago.
Soong was not happy about being brushed off, so he used his direct connection to Chen, going to Sun Moon Lake, where he walked right through the lines of police officers protecting the Chinese envoy to have a private meeting in his capacity as a “normal citizen.” This highlights both Soong’s extraordinary privileges and the fact that Chen does not require approval from Ma to see whomever he wishes to see.
Although the semi-official meeting between Chen and Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) had already given Ma a headache, Soong said that if it weren’t for him and Lien, “Mr Chen probably would never have been able to come to Taiwan.”
This makes it sound as if Soong made considerable contributions to cross-strait negotiations, but listening more carefully, it reminds me of when the Manchu army was allowed to walk through the Great Wall of China to bring down the Ming Dynasty.
Ma managed to stop Lien, Wu and Soong from doting on Chen, but at the banquet given by host Jason Hu, Lien and Wu cheerfully toasted Chen as if there were no problem. From anti-communism to pro-communist defeatism, the KMT nobility enjoy themselves while trampling all over Taiwan. Their treachery is unacceptable.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
RSS